FS: EBA publishes recommendations on aligning remuneration with ESG risk

Tapestry Newsletters

2 July 2021

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published a report and factsheet setting out its proposals to further align remuneration within credit institutions and investment firms to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks within those firms. This report follows a consultation process that ended in February 2021. EU legislators will now review the report and will consider whether to make any legislative changes. The EBA will also use the report as a basis for the development of guidelines on the management of ESG risks by firms and the supervision of ESG risks by regulators. The EBA invites firms to actively reflect on the content of the report and its recommendations.

In November 2020, the EBA launched a consultation in relation to the inclusion of ESG factors and risks into the regulatory and supervisory framework for credit institutions and investment firms. This report contains the results of that consultation and sets out recommendations relating to the definition and assessment of ESG risks, the management of ESG risks and the supervision and evaluation of ESG risks by regulators. The report also identifies weaknesses in how firms currently incorporate ESG risks into their governance practices.

Key remuneration-related observations

The key remuneration-related observations are as follows:

  • There appears to be a general failure to integrate remuneration policies into the firm’s business strategy, core values and long-term interests in a way that accounts for ESG risks, ensures sound risk management and mitigates excessive risk taking in this area.
  • A robust and appropriate incentive-based mechanism is important for achieving an appropriate risk culture. When designing their ESG risk strategy, firms should evaluate how to account for ESG risks in their remuneration policies. This is particularly relevant to the firm’s material risk takers.
  • Aligning the firm’s remuneration policy with the firm’s ESG objectives, e.g. long-term resilience of the business strategy under ESG considerations and risk appetite, is important for avoiding conflicts of interest when business decisions are taken.
  • Remuneration policies that give the right incentives for staff to favour decisions in line with the firm’s ESG risk-related strategy would facilitate the implementation of ESG risk-related objectives and/or limits, as the staff would benefit from meeting these targets. The impact of remuneration policies on the achievement of sound and effective long-term risk management objectives, with regard to ESG considerations, may be especially relevant when it comes to the variable remuneration of material risk takers, and in particular when they have responsibilities for defining and implementing ESG-related strategy.

Key remuneration-related recommendations

The EBA notes in the report that they see the need for firms to proportionately incorporate ESG risks into their internal governance arrangements, including by ensuring that remuneration policies are aligned with the firm’s long-term interests, business strategy, objectives and values. The EBA has issued recommendations for firms that are intended to help to achieve this.

The key remuneration-related recommendations are as follows:

  • Firms should consider ESG indicators and ESG risk-related objectives and/or limits when taking into account the long-term interests of the firm in the design of remuneration policies and their application, including considering the implementation of a remuneration policy that links the variable remuneration of the firm’s material risk takers, taking into account their respective roles and responsibilities, to the successful achievement of those objectives, while ensuring that ‘green-washing’ and excessive risk-taking practices are avoided.
  • Firms should establish a framework to mitigate and manage conflicts of interest which incentivise short-term-oriented undue ESG-related risk-taking, including ‘green-washing’ or mis-selling of products.
  • The EBA recommends that EU legislators adapt legislation in directives and regulations applicable to the banking sector to incorporate ESG risk-related considerations and enable the implementation of the EBA’s recommendations set out above.
  • The supervisory review of firms should proportionately incorporate ESG risk-specific considerations into the assessment of the firm’s internal governance and wide controls, including monitoring how ESG factors and risks will be incorporated into the firm’s remuneration policies and practices.

Tapestry comment
ESG is definitely the topic of the day and various EU bodies have been active in this space. This report is the latest in an increasingly long line of initiatives that seek to ensure the effective management and supervision of ESG risks and considerations, following the recently effective Taxonomy Regulation and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation.

Although this report covers a much broader scope than just remuneration, the EBA’s focus on aligning remuneration to ESG risks is notable. Although the recommendations set out in the report do not result in an immediate change to any rules or guidelines, the EBA has said that they will use the report to develop further guidance for firms and they have encouraged EU legislators to seek to adapt legislation to enable the implementation of their recommendations, including certain of the remuneration recommendations noted above. This may mean that we will see more prescriptive expectations or requirements in relation to the incorporation of ESG risks into remuneration policies and practices in the future. We will monitor the position and will issue an alert if we see any such developments.

As a consequence of the UK leaving the EU, these recommendations will not directly apply to UK-regulated firms. That said, the UK is also active in the ESG space (for example, the Financial Conduct Authority are consulting on extending climate related disclosures to standard listed companies and on ESG integration in UK capital markets) and so we may see a similar focus on aligning remuneration to ESG risks from the UK regulators at some point.


In any event, the direction of travel is clear and the legal framework surrounding ESG is evolving worldwide and firms should explore how to tackle ESG risks and challenges, including by using their remuneration policies and practices as a tool to manage and mitigate risk. It is important to remember, however, that the link between remuneration and ESG, while important, is part of a larger risk management and mitigation puzzle that needs to be considered holistically by firms.

If you have any questions on this or anything else, please do get in touch. We would be delighted to help. 

Matthew Hunter
Matthew Hunter

EU adopts adequacy decision at 11th hour

Tapestry Newsletters

29 June 2021

There was an audible release of breath yesterday when the European Commission adopted the adequacy decision, ensuring the UK’s data protection rules are fit for EU purposes. The decision means the UK will not be treated as a third country for the purposes of the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR), and allows the continued free flow of data between the EU and UK. 
 
As outlined in an earlier newsletter (here), the deadline for reaching an agreement was 30 June so (as we have come to expect) the decision really did come down to the wire.
 
Timing of the adequacy decision

The adequacy decision formalises an interim arrangement under the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement, which was signed on 24 December 2020.  Under this arrangement, it was agreed that the UK would not be treated as a third country under GDPR for 6 months from the Jan 1 “Brexit Day” to allow time for the adequacy decision.
 
Now that the adequacy decision has been formally adopted, UK data privacy rules (which are based almost entirely on EU law passed before Brexit Day) are treated as giving a similar level of protection as the GDPR which allows EU based companies to continue to transfer personal data the UK without the need for alternative safeguarding mechanisms. 
 
Achieving adequacy status
 
An early decision was hoped for as the UK has incorporated GDPR into domestic law and so the UK and EU rules are mostly aligned. History, however, suggested otherwise as the EU has adopted only 12 adequacy decisions since 1995 (and usually only after a  very  lengthy process).
 
Keeping it adequate

All adequacy decisions are subject to periodic review (every four years) and any move by the UK to change its data protection rules in a manner which is viewed as detrimental to the data protection rights of EU citizens could result in the adequacy decision being revoked.  The European Parliament and the Council may request the EC to amend or withdraw any adequacy decision.
 
Transfers of personal data from the UK to the EU

The UK has already declared GDPR as adequate for the purposes of UK data protection law. Now the EU adequacy decision has been formally adopted, the transfer of personal data between the UK and the EU will continue to carry on in much the same manner as before the UK’s departure from the EU.

Tapestry comment
“No change in the rules” should not be very big news but we are where we are. This is very positive news for companies transferring personal data from the EU to the UK. Doubtless there are a lot of people breathing a sigh of relief today given the troublesome alternatives to managing UK-EU data without an adequacy decision. We were hoping for an earlier announcement but there was a general feeling that common sense would prevail and, let’s not be churlish, this was agreed a whole 2 days ahead of deadline!

Chris Fallon, Sharon Thwaites & Tom Parker

UK: Changes to UK MAR reporting - from 29 June

Tapestry Newsletters

24 June 2021

The Financial Services Act 2021 is bringing in new changes to UK MAR which will take effect from next Tuesday, 29 June 2021. The key change is an extension to the deadline for companies to notify the market of transactions by their persons disclosing managerial responsibilities (PDMRs) or any persons closely associated (PCAs) with the PDMR.

Background
 
UK MAR is the UK’s post-Brexit implementation of the EU’s Market Abuse Regulation. It contains a number of restrictions on dealings in securities by PDMRs and those with inside information. In a share plans context, ‘dealings’ caught by UK MAR can be quite wide-ranging – including grants, vestings and exercises, as well as sales of shares.
 
UK MAR also contains notification requirements for dealings by PDMRs and their PCAs, which are 3-fold: 

  1. The PDMR / PCA must notify the company of the dealing;
  2. The PDMR / PCA must notify the regulator (the FCA) of the dealing; and
  3. The company must notify the market of the dealing.

In each case, this notification currently has to be made within 3 business days of the dealing taking place.

New notification timing
 
The changes coming into effect in the UK next week relate to the deadline for companies to notify the dealing to the market. From 29 June, instead of having to notify the market within 3 days of the dealing itself, the company will have to make the notification within 2 working days of when the company itself is notified by the PDMR / PCA.
 
This does not change the timing for the PDMR / PCA notifications to the company and the FCA – these still need to be made within 3 working days of the dealing taking place (although there is a new definition of 'working days' as well).

Tapestry comment  
This is a positive change that will be welcomed by companies. There has been wide-spread criticism of the alignment of the deadlines for the 3 notifications since MAR was first introduced 5 years ago. This is due to the fact that companies may not be aware of PDMR / PCA dealings until notified by the individual themselves, and if they choose not to notify the company until towards the end of the deadline, the company may not have sufficient time to then notify the market within that same 3 day deadline.
 
It is for this reason that many companies have written shorter deadlines, for the individual to notify the company, into their internal dealing code and/or dealing policies. In preparation for next week’s change, companies may want to revisit these documents and consider whether they should be updated to reflect the new timing.
 
The change brings UK MAR into line with EU MAR, which adopted this change from the beginning of this year. Following the end of the Brexit transition period, any changes to EU MAR are not automatically incorporated into UK MAR, but will require separate UK legislation to bring them into effect, as happened here. Whilst it is clear that the UK government will keep abreast of EU MAR developments and consider amending UK MAR to retain consistency, the UK could choose to deviate in future. To this end, Tapestry, working with the Share Plan Lawyers Group, is currently involved in detailed discussions with the FCA about the future of UK MAR and we hope that this will bring helpful clarifications and beneficial changes to UK MAR for the incentives industry. It will be interesting to see how these discussions develop and we will, as always, keep you up to date with matters as they progress.


If you have any questions about this alert, or we can help you with any queries you have about MAR, please do let us know.

Hannah Needle FGE

Hannah Needle

Ireland - New Form ESA has landed!

Tapestry Newsletters

23 June 2021

We previously issued an alert to notify you that the Irish tax authority (the Revenue) had announced that it would be releasing a new electronic return for reporting share-based remuneration.

The Revenue has now released the new template Employer Share Award return (Form ESA). The template is available on the Revenue’s website and can be found here. The new form must be filed online and is intended to capture all share-based awards (restricted stock units, convertible shares, forfeitable shares, discounted shares including purchase plans, and any other award with cash-equivalent of shares) that are not currently reported on a separate share plan return.

Revenue guidance
The template Form ESA includes notes for assistance with its completion. The Revenue has also released eBrief No. 120/21, which notes that various chapters of the Share Schemes manual have been updated to include reference to the Form ESA reporting requirements.

Timing and reporting deadline
The new reporting requirement applies for the tax year 2020 onwards. The deadline for reporting for the 2020 tax year has been extended to 31 August 2021. For tax year 2021, and in subsequent years, the Form ESA will have the same 31 March filing deadline as the Revenue’s other share plan returns.

Registration for share plan reporting
Companies that are not already registered for online share plan reporting with the Revenue's Online Service (ROS) must arrange to register now. If companies have been filing Form RSS1 (in relation to share options) and/or Forms ESS1 and KEEP1 (in relation to qualified share plans), then it is likely that they will already be registered for online filing. Whilst registering is a straight forward process, it can take approximately 3 days to complete.

Continuing payroll reporting obligations
This new reporting requirement for share plans is in addition to normal payroll reporting and withholding obligations. For example, if a company makes a share-based award (e.g. a free share award) to an employee today, the taxable benefit must still be reported through payroll as normal. The employer must then additionally report the award, using Form ESA by 31 March 2022.

Tapestry comment
As with all share plan reporting, we recommend that you prepare well in advance so you don’t get caught having to rush to find the required information as the reporting deadline looms. The scope of the Form ESA means employers with larger scale and/or more complex share incentive arrangements in Ireland must be prepared for a more time-consuming reporting process in this and future years. If you are not already registered to make e-filings through the ROS – you should start this process in good time prior to the filing deadline to avoid issues.  

We would like to thank one of our relationship firms in Ireland, McCann Fitzgerald, for alerting us to this update.

Sally Blanchflower and Sonia Taylor

UK: Annual share plan filing deadline approaches!

Tapestry Newsletters

17 June 2021

All employers operating employment related securities (ERS) plans in the UK, including share plans, must submit an ERS return with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) by 6 July following the end of the tax year. The deadline for filing the ERS return for the 2020/21 tax year, ending 5 April 2021, is Tuesday 6 July 2021. As the registration and reporting process can take some time, we recommend that employers prepare and file the returns with HMRC as soon as possible.

What do I need to do?

Register the plan

  • Before you can submit your ERS return, all relevant share plans must have been registered online with HMRC via the registration services found here. To do this, you will need a Government Gateway user ID and password. Your UK payroll will typically have these details.
  • UK tax advantaged Share Incentive Plans (SIPs), Save As You Earn plans (SAYE plans) and Company Share Option Plans (CSOPs) must also be ‘self-certified’ online as being compliant with applicable UK tax legislation.
  • If your plan has been registered and self-certified (if relevant) previously, you will not need to register it again. Registration will only be required for new plans implemented during the 2020/21 tax year. You should be provided with a unique scheme reference number for the plan within 7 days of registration.

File the ERS return

  • Once you have the unique scheme reference number for your plan, you will be able to file the ERS return.
  • To file the return, you must complete the relevant online template located on the UK Government website here.
  • Each template asks for prescribed information in connection with relevant ‘reportable events’.
  • The template that you must use will depend on the plan that you are completing the return for. Plans that are not UK tax advantaged plans will use the “other ERS schemes and arrangements” template and there are specific templates for each of the UK tax advantaged plans.
  • Once you have completed the template, you can run it through a formatting check and then submit the return here.

What are some of the key points to look out for?

  • Don’t leave it to the last day: we recommend that you complete and file your returns (and, if needed, register and self-certify) well in advance of the 6 July deadline. Once a plan is registered, it normally can take up to 7 seven days before the unique scheme reference number is provided to enable the filing to be made and the filing cannot be made before you have that. It can also take some time to work through the template, gather the necessary information to complete it and then carefully check it to ensure that there are no mistakes. Clients typically also have a few questions that they want to run by us before submitting the returns and so that would need to be factored into the timeline.
  • Non-tax advantaged plans: you do not need to register and file a return for each non-tax advantaged plan separately. A single registration and return covering all existing non-tax advantaged plans will be sufficient. Please note, however, that all UK tax advantaged plans must be registered separately with separate returns filed.
  • No plan activity: where you have registered a plan, you must continue to file a return even where there has been no plan activity in the relevant tax year. In these circumstances, a ‘nil return’ should be filed.  
  • Outages: in previous years, the website where the return is submitted has experienced outages. The web page that is found here will notify users of any current and planned issues or outages.
  • Terminated plans: if you no longer use a share plan, you will still need to make an annual return for outstanding awards. Once all awards have ‘paid out’, you can stop filing but only after you have informed HMRC that the plan has terminated. Further information on this is available here.
  • Templates: we recommend that you always download the most recent templates from here and avoid using previously downloaded templates. The templates are format sensitive. You should not alter the template in any way, e.g. by deleting tabs or columns, altering the format or changing its name. Altering the template will result in an error message and the gateway will not allow you to upload it. The checking service found here allows companies to check for formatting errors prior to filing the completed templates. We recommend using this service to avoid delays in filing.
  • Template file names: the file names for the templates still have “2015-6” in the title because they have not been renamed since they were first made available by HMRC. However, the templates available online are the latest versions and HMRC has confirmed that the templates should continue to be used and the format must not be changed (do not even attempt to expand the column sizes).
  • EMI plans: there are different (and more onerous) requirements and deadlines for UK tax advantaged Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) option plans. Please get in touch if you operate, or are intending to operate, an EMI plan.

Why is it important to register and file the return on time?

Failure to register and/or file the return on time can have serious consequences:

  • Financial penalties automatically apply if you fail to register your plans (and, for certain tax advantaged plans, self-certify that they are compliant plans) by the deadline.
  • Financial penalties automatically apply if you fail to correctly file your ERS returns by the 6 July deadline, even if no reportable events occurred in the tax year.
  • Newly adopted UK tax advantaged plans will lose their tax status if you fail to register and self-certify them by the deadline where awards have been granted in the 2020/21 tax year. This means that any awards granted under new SIPs, SAYE plans and CSOPs on or after 6 April 2020 would not be tax advantaged. 

Tapestry comment 
The memories of HMRC’s benign approach to late paper based returns fade into folklore, as told by elder share plan lawyers to wide eyed novices, who know nothing but automated penalties levied for late registration and filings. The move to online reporting has meant HMRC will fine companies who do not submit returns on time without a good excuse. We suspect, unlike last year, HMRC will be much less willing to accept Covid-19 related excuses for lateness.

The online registration and reporting system is still unwieldy and often confusingly counterintuitive. It can take time to ensure a plan is registered before the return for that plan is submitted. HMRC’s dogmatic approach to terminology can be confusing, so that the actual preparation of a return can be much more complicated and time consuming (and stressful) than an unsuspecting share plan manager might expect. For example, issues like net settlement of awards require a specific reporting approach which is far from clear when confronted by the return template in isolation.

If you have not yet done so, take time to ensure your plans are registered and that you are familiar with the requirements of the return(s) you need to file so that the 6 July deadline can be met.

We assist a number of clients with their ERS registrations and returns each year. If we can assist you with this, please let us know.

Matthew Hunter and Chris Fallon

UK - End of the 5 April tax year?

Tapestry Newsletters

4 June 2021

The Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) has today announced a plan to review the potential for moving the UK tax year. The review will look into the benefits, costs and wider implications of changing the date of the end of the UK tax year for individuals from the current 5 April to either 31 March or 31 December.

What is the focus of the review? 

The main focus of the review will be on the 31 March date as this is both the end of a calendar quarter and the closest month end to the end of the current tax year. It is also the financial year end date for the UK government and the date used for corporation tax rate changes.

Why change the tax year? 

The current tax year end date of 5 April dates back to a change to the UK calendar in 1800. Although the UK’s tax and accounting systems have developed around this date, businesses and most global tax systems tend to account to a month and quarter end date, with the majority of countries using the calendar year as their tax year, ending on 31 December. Other countries have made this change - for example, Ireland moved its tax year end from 5 April to 31 December in 2002 and in 2019 Costa Rica switched from a 30 September year end to 31 December.

What are the implications of changing the tax year? 

The OTS will look at how the change to the tax year could impact on tax collection and compliance, in particular in relation to income tax, PAYE, national insurance contributions, capital gains tax and inheritance tax. Amongst other issues, the review will also look into the financial and administrative implications for stakeholders (taxpayers, employers and businesses) and the practical implications of the change on IT systems operated by government departments.  Any change will also have to take into account the views of the devolved governments of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

Would there be a long or short first tax year? 

The expectation is that whichever date is chosen, the first tax year following the change (the transitional year) will result in a shorter tax year. If the tax year ends on 31 March, the transitional year would be shortened by five days and run from 6 April to the following 31 March. If the year end was moved to 31 December, the transitional year would be shortened by three months and five days and run from 6 April to the following 31 December.

What is the timing? 

The OTS will publish its report this Summer. 

Tapestry comment
If it wasn’t June, we might have mistaken this for an April Fool’s Day joke!   

Although many countries do use a 31 December tax year end (including the US and all EU countries), there are a number which have kept historic tax year dates. These include countries with which the UK has strong links such as Australia (ends 30 June), New Zealand and India (both end 31 March). However, all those countries do account to a quarter end date. It is rare for a country to have a tax year that does not end at the end of a month (we can think of Ethiopia, Iran and Nepal) and the OTS is looking to operate to its brief, in simplifying the structure by bringing the UK tax year for individuals into line with the government tax year.

The report from the OTS is expected this summer but remember that the OTS is only an advisory body and any changes to the tax year will ultimately be decided by the government. We will be watching with interest and you can be sure that we will let you know the outcome of the review.
 
If you would like to discuss this update, or anything else, please do contact us

Hannah Needle and Sharon Thwaites

FS: PRA statement on identification of material risk takers

Tapestry Newsletters

25 May 2021

The UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has today issued a statement setting out the PRA’s approach to updating the requirements for identifying ‘material risk takers’ (MRTs) and the PRA’s expectations in relation to MRT exclusions in the current performance year. This update will be relevant for firms that are subject to the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.

Background

Firms subject to the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook are required to identify those members of staff that have a material impact on the firm’s risk profile, known as MRTs, and comply with certain requirements in connection with their remuneration.

To ensure the consistent identification of MRTs, the European Banking Authority (EBA) developed regulatory technical standards in 2014 for use in connection with the remuneration rules set out under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. These standards set out the quantitative and qualitative criteria that firms were required to use to identify their MRTs. These standards applied directly in the UK in accordance with EU law prior to the end of the EU-UK Brexit transition period and, following that period, were “onshored” into UK law.

In connection with the implementation of the Capital Requirements Directive V (CRD V), the EBA was tasked with revising those regulatory technical standards to reflect changes to the underlying rules. The revised standards will repeal and supersede the 2014 standards. As we reported here, the EBA published its final draft of the revised regulatory technical standards on 18 June 2020.  This final draft has been adopted by the EBA and has been submitted to the European Commission for publication.

The PRA implemented the CRD V remuneration requirements into the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook from 29 December 2020. As the EBA’s revised standards had not been formally published at this stage, the PRA decided to incorporate the draft revised standards instead, anticipating that the final standards would be formally approved shortly after the implementation of CRD V, repealing and superseding the 2014 standards. This formal approval has not yet happened. As the revised standards were intended to replace the 2014 standards, there is currently a position whereby the 2014 standards continue to apply in law but the PRA has incorporated the framework set out in the draft revised standards into their regulatory requirements. Today’s statement is intended to address this.

Key points

The PRA is aware of the discrepancy that the current position creates between the 2014 standards, which continue to apply in UK law, and the draft revised standards, which apply to firms under the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook. The PRA intends to consult on updating this position later in the year. The PRA’s statement sets out their views on the current position during the intervening period:

  • The 2014 standards (as onshored into the UK) continue to apply, are binding in their entirety and must continue to be complied with. Firms must also apply the draft revised standards for the purposes of determining the individuals subject to the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
  • In general, the PRA expects that the application of the draft revised standards will cover a broader scope of individuals than the 2014 standards and that, by applying the former, firms will also meet the requirements of the latter, subject to the point below.
  • Where the 2014 standards require firms to identify individuals who do not meet any of the criteria under the draft revised standards, the PRA considers that firms do not need to apply the requirements of the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook in relation to those individuals solely on the basis that they meet the criteria of the 2014 standards if the firm does not consider that the professional activities of those individuals have a material impact on the firm’s risk profile.
  • The PRA considers the draft revised standards to be a minimum standard and firms must assess whether an individual’s professional activities have a material impact on the firm’s risk profile, even if they do not fall within any of the mandatory criteria established under the applicable rules.
  • The PRA is reviewing the templates that firms may voluntarily use to communicate information to the PRA on their MRTs’ identification and exclusion (known as ‘Remuneration Policy Statement (RPS) tables 1a, 2 and 8’). Amended templates for Stage 1 and 2 submissions will be published this summer, and the remaining templates by November this year.
  • If a firm wishes to exclude an MRT under Rule 3.1 of the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook and Article 7 of the draft revised standards, firms must apply to the PRA for a waiver. The PRA will provide more detail on how to apply for the waivers when it publishes the updated templates.
  • The PRA recognises that firms with a fiscal year-end of 31 December may require additional time to submit the RPS tables on MRT Identification and Exclusion (tables 1a, 2 and 8), the RPS Questionnaires and Annex 1: malus. In this instance, firms may submit them by Thursday 30 September. This is only applicable for the 2021/22 remuneration round.
  • If firms have further questions or concerns relating to this matter, they should contact their supervisors.

Tapestry comment
We know that many impacted firms have been working to identify their MRTs using the draft revised standards following the implementation of the CRD V remuneration rules into the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook last year. The PRA’s indication that compliance with the draft revised standards is likely to be wide enough to result in compliance with the 2014 standards will give firms some comfort. The PRA is clear, however, that they expect firms to ensure that both the 2014 standards and the draft revised standards have been applied and so firms should undertake an assessment of both sets of standards to identify any discrepancies (if any). If there are any such discrepancies, firms should consider whether the exclusion identified in the list above would be available.

I expect that one of the most helpful parts of this statement is the clarification that companies with a fiscal year-end of 31 December may submit certain documents, including the RPS tables, to the PRA by Thursday 30 September. Although this is a helpful extension, September will come around fairly quickly and firms should take steps to ensure the documents are submitted before this new deadline.

The PRA has stated their intention to consult on updating the position later this year to deal with the issues considered in today’s statement. We will keep an eye out for this development and issue an alert as soon as we see this. In the meantime, if you have any questions on this alert or would like any assistance with your remuneration regulation compliance, please do let me know.

 
Matthew Hunter

Matthew Hunter

Ireland: New share plan reporting return announced

Tapestry Newsletters

24 May 2021

The Irish tax authority (the Revenue) has announced that it will soon be releasing a new electronic return for reporting share-based remuneration. 

Current on-line reporting of share plan income

Although employers are already required to report all incentive-related income to the Revenue, currently the only specific reporting forms are for option plans (reported on form RSS1) and qualified share plans (ESS1 and KEEP1), all of which are filed on-line through the Revenue Online Service (ROS). 

New reporting obligation

The Revenue is now extending mandatory on-line reporting to cover other types of incentive income including RSUs, restricted shares, convertible shares, forfeitable shares, discounted shares and any other award with the cash-equivalent of shares. The e-report for the new Employers Share Awards (ESA) return will be similar in format to the existing reports, which are set out in a pre-formatted spreadsheet which is uploaded through the ROS.

Timing and reporting deadline

The new ESA return is expected to be available in June, with the deadline for reporting for the 2020 tax year extended to 31 August 2021. For tax year 2021, and in subsequent years, the ESA return will have the same 31 March filing deadline as the other share plan returns. Companies which have not previously made e-filings through ROS, should first complete the registration procedure (which can take up to three business days), as only registered users have access to the on-line filing system.

Tapestry comment
As with all share plan reporting, we recommend that you prepare well in advance so you don’t get caught having to rush to find the required information as the reporting deadline looms. The scope of the return means employers with larger scale and/or more complex share incentive arrangements in Ireland must be prepared for a more time consuming reporting process in this and future years. The Revenue has confirmed that it will be releasing additional information over the next few weeks and we will let you know once the ESA return is available on the Revenue website. 

The new reporting system feels reminiscent of the UK online reporting overhaul from a few years ago. That ran into teething trouble on deadline day as the online reporting portal collapsed. Many returns vanished and had to be submitted twice. This experience means we recommend early submission of the new Irish return to help avoid similar issues here!


We would like to thank one of our relationship firms in Ireland, A&L Goodbody, for alerting us to this update.

Please let us know if you have any questions about this new filing.

Chris Fallon and Sharon Thwaites

Tapestry Alert: Global - Early taxation in Australia removed

Tapestry Newsletters

13 May 2021

On 11 May, the Australian Treasurer handed down the 2021-22 Budget
 
The Treasurer announced various taxation measures aimed at reducing the unemployment rate. Amongst these measures was the removal of a tax trigger for tax-deferred Employee Share Schemes (ESS) at the point of participants leaving employment.

Currently, when an individual leaves employment and retains any unvested shares under an ESS in Australia, taxation will generally be triggered at that time.

The Australian Government has proposed removing this earlier taxation point for share and option schemes. The moment of taxation will then generally be the point at which the award is no longer at risk of forfeiture and there are no restrictions on disposal (in practice this would be the point of vest of a conditional award or exercise of an option).

This change will apply to ESS interests issued from the first income year after the date of Royal Assent of enabling legislation (Australian income years commence on 1 July).

The Government also announced that it will remove regulatory requirements for ESS where employers do not charge or lend to the employees offered the ESS.  

These measures are intended to help Australian companies to engage and retain the talent they need to compete on a global stage.

We will update you further when we have confirmation on the date these rules come into effect.

Tapestry comment
Taxation on cessation of employment can result in individuals suffering a "dry" tax charge (i.e. an unfunded charge as no share sale proceeds will be available to fund the tax charge). This can damage the effectiveness of "incentive" awards. This change will help to bring Australia in line with many other jurisdictions, making administration of leavers much easier for global companies and giving "good leavers" the ability to settle taxes due at the applicable tax point. Whilst this removal of early taxation for leavers is beneficial for ESS, the new rules being applicable to issues of ESS interests following implementation means the benefits may not be recognised for some time. 
 

If you would like to discuss this update, or anything else, please do contact us

Chris Fallon and Emilie Sylvester

 

May 2021: Tapestry's Worldwide Wrap-up - Tap into our global knowledge!

7 May 2021

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies. 

To help you keep on top of recent developments, here is the second in our series of quarterly Worldwide Wrap-Up newsletters for 2021, with some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. We have summarised these topics briefly in this alert, however they will be covered in more detail, along with other recent developments, on our 12 May webinar.

BrexitBrexit Updates

Data protection
: In our January Worldwide Wrap-up (here), we noted that the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement included a four month transition period (extended to six months, so expiring on 30 June 2021) under which the UK would not be treated as a third country for EU data protection law (GDPR). The purpose of the transition period was to give the EU time to adopt an adequacy decision confirming that the UK’s data protection rules will be treated as having equivalent status to GDPR. On 19 February, the EU Commission published a draft adequacy decision. The draft decision is now under consideration by the European Data Protection Board and a committee composed of representatives of the EU Member States. 

Social Security: the detached worker rules set out the post-Brexit agreement between the UK and EU member states to allow citizens of one state to continue to make social security contributions in their home state if working for a short period (up to 24 months) in another state. The EU member states all had to opt in to the detached worker rules and this was finally announced in February.

Tapestry comment:
These may seem like small points but they had everyone worried in December last year when it looked like no arrangements would be in place. There is still concern over the EU adequacy decision as the 30 June deadline is just over the horizon and historically such decisions take years rather than weeks.

Canada Flag Canada - proposed cap on deductions for stock options
There was no Canadian federal budget in 2020 due to the Covid pandemic but the 2021 budget is now progressing. Budget 2021 has confirmed the government’s plan to proceed with a proposal to limit the tax reduction currently available for holders of stock options (see our most recent newsletter here). We will be watching to see if the enabling legislation is in place by the planned commencement date for the new rules which is currently 1 July. 

Tapestry comment:
After several false starts, it looks increasingly likely that this change will come into force in 2021, and it is expected to have a major impact on the value of stock options for employees in Canada. We will continue to monitor developments.


Canada FlagCanada - additional reporting for non-resident trusts
In 2018, the Canadian government announced plans to require additional reporting by trusts (see our alert here). The new rules will require a trust to file a tax return, even if it has had no distributable income for the year, and to file a schedule reporting the identity of all trustees, beneficiaries and settlors of the trust, along with any other persons who have a measure of control over the trust or the decision making of the trustees. The new reporting rules are due to take effect from tax year 2021 but have not yet become law.

Tapestry comment
Although the new rules are not yet law, it would be prudent for companies operating share plans for employees in Canada, and who make use of a trust to hold the shares, to ensure that they have this information available.
  

GIG economy - Uber drivers are workers not self-employed

On 19 February, the UK Supreme Court confirmed earlier decisions that Uber drivers are workers for the purposes of UK employment legislation and are therefore entitled to receive national minimum wage and annual paid leave. Under UK law, employment status is categorised in three ways:

  • Employees who have the full protection of employment law
  • Workers who are entitled to more limited rights
  • Self-employed who have limited employment rights.

In the Uber case, the company argued that the drivers were self-employed under the terms of the contractual arrangement between Uber and the drivers. The court rejected this argument and found that the level of control that Uber had over the drivers created a worker status. The court held that the designation of the drivers in the contract as self-employed could not change the employment status of the individuals.
Tapestry comment
The GIG economy has been hailed as creating a 21st century work model, but it has raised difficult questions over the status of the individuals who work for GIG economy, or platform companies. In the share plan world, if Uber drivers are not employees, they will usually not be able to benefit from share plans which are generally only available to employees. Although Uber initially suggested that the ruling only applied to the drivers who brought the case, it subsequently confirmed that it will treat all its drivers as workers, which means they are now entitled to receive minimum pay, paid leave and pensions. As the Uber case impacts on other platform companies, will these costs be absorbed by the companies or passed on to consumers? Or will gig economy companies look for creative ways to realign their business model to limit the impact of this and similar decisions in other countries?

Global tax rates for 2021

With several countries starting the 2021 tax year in March and April, and new rates being announced since our last webinar, we will look at where rates have changed. Our international advisors provide us with new rates to update our database as quickly as they become available. In this Wrap-Up we take a brief look at some of the changes.  
New Zealand - top rate of individual tax increased from 33% to 39%
South Africa - top rate tax band increased
UK - increase in personal allowance (no further increases until 2025/26) 
Tapestry comment
We will discuss the detail of these changes during our 12 May webinar. 


Global reporting

Remember to be ahead of the game with global reporting deadlines. Coming up in the next few months:

  • Australia - ESS statement (employees) 14 July and ESS report (tax office) 14 August
  • India - quarterly tax certificate  - 31 July
  • Portugal - share plan reporting on Form Modelo 19 - 30 June
  • UK - annual employee share plan return - 6 July

Tapestry comment
If you need this information for other jurisdictions not shown above or if you need any assistance with any global filings, please do get in touch with us.


USA - Doubling of CGT proposed
The US government has recently proposed an effective doubling of the CGT rate for tax payers earning over $1 million a year. Currently the rate of CGT paid depends on whether the asset is subject to short term rates (where the asset was held for less than 12 months) or long term rates (held for over 12 months). The short term rate is the tax payer’s marginal tax rate and the long term CGT rate is a flat 20% (plus 3.8% net investment tax for high earners).  The proposal abolishes the distinction between short term and long term CGT so that all capital gains would be taxed at marginal income tax rates. Combined with a plan to increase the top rate of income tax from 37% to 39.6%, this would bring the top CGT rate to 43.4%, once the net investment tax was added. The same change would apply to dividends.

Tapestry comment
It is too early to say if there is a realistic chance that such a significant change to US taxes will be approved.  If adopted, such a change may impact the attractiveness of long-term share ownership. Low rates of CGT can encourage participants to retain their shares, knowing that any increase in value is taxed at lower CGT rates. Equalising of rates of income tax and CGT would negatively impact the position of taxpayer participants.
Of course, many countries already treat capital gains as a standard part of personal income and subject to the same tax rates and, with governments struggling to fill the fiscal gap created by the Covid pandemic, more countries may look to follow the US example - assuming it is adopted.  Indeed, a similar proposal was included in the 2020 report of the UK Office of Tax Simplification (see our newsletter here). Although the UK government did not increase CGT rates in the recent UK budget, they did not rule out doing so in the future.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss any element of legal and tax compliance for your global incentive plans, do get in touch - we would be delighted to help!

Sally Blanchflower, Matthew Hunter and Tom Parker