Tapestry's Worldwide Wrap-Up. Tap-in to our global knowledge!

January 2022

Happy New Year and we hope that you had a relaxing break over the holidays.

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies. 

To help you keep on top of recent developments, here is our first quarterly Worldwide Wrap-Up of 2022, with some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. We have summarised these topics briefly in this alert, however they will be covered in more detail along with other recent developments on our 12 January webinar, which you can register for here

Australia - employee share scheme tax and regulatory reforms

As discussed in our last wrap-up webinar (and summarised here), last July the Australian government released draft legislation to implement reforms to the taxation and regulation of employee share schemes (ESS). In a case of one step forward and another step sideways, the government has separated the tax and regulatory reforms and, in November, tabled a bill in parliament which will remove the taxing point on cessation of employment for ESS awards. One advantage of the draft bill is that the removal of cessation of employment as a taxing point will apply to all existing ESS that have not yet reached a taxing point. Previously, the reform was only going to apply to awards granted after the start of the tax year following Royal Assent of the reform (which will not be before 1 July 2022). Plans to simplify the securities law exemptions are subject to a further period of consultation which started on 20 December and will end on 4 February.

Tapestry comment
The tax reform is widely welcomed, particularly for companies who have increasing numbers of mobile employees. The retrospective effect of the latest draft bill is also particularly helpful in widening the number of awards that can potentially benefit from the new rules. We will be following the changes and will keep you updated.

Canada FlagCanada - termination provisions upheld

The decision of Battiston v Microsoft (discussed here) originally held that a termination provision in an employee share plan was not enforceable, even though the employee had accepted the terms of the provision, on the grounds that it was "harsh and oppressive" and that insufficient steps had been taken to bring it to the employee’s attention. The appeal court overturned the previous decision. It was accepted that the employee clicked to accept the terms of the plan even though he did not read the terms. The court held that this constituted notice and that by accepting the terms without reading them, the employee could not be put in a better position than an employee who did read the terms of the plan.

Tapestry comment
This outcome means that companies offering share plans in Canada may be able to start relying on the standard tick box acceptance approach again. However, it is of course important to consider which provisions should be highlighted to participants as a matter of best practice. This will usually include termination provisions, in particular, still in Canada.

China - extends preferential tax treatment

On 29 December 2021, the Chinese authorities confirmed that the preferential income tax treatment for registered share plans under Circular 164 would be extended to the end of 2022. Previously, the tax treatment was due to expire on 31 December 2021. In addition, the beneficial income tax treatment for a one-time bonus has been extended to the end of 2023.

Tapestry comment
Although not unexpected, the extension of the tax treatment for a further year will be welcomed by share plan employees in China. On the webinar, we will also discuss the tax filing requirements under the updated Circular 35, which relate to the preferential income tax treatment for share plans.

Data Protection - global update

The spread of data protection legislation continues. As discussed in previous alerts, there has been a flurry of activity as countries around the globe move to put in place rules that, to a greater or lesser extent, follow the EU ‘gold standard’ set by the GDPR. Over the past few months we have seen developments in Saudi Arabia, UAE and Vietnam.

Tapestry comment
Many countries are following the lead of the EU and putting in place robust rules for dealing with personal data. This is not a share plan specific issue but as share plans are often operated globally, rules surrounding how employees agree to their data being used, and restrictions on the transfer of personal data, impact on the operation of share plans. We will discuss a few of the recent updates.

Global tax rates

For many countries, revised tax rates start on New Year’s Day. Often the rates are only announced in the last days of December, and in some cases the final figures are not available until well into January, sometimes later. Our international advisors provide us with new rates to update OnTap as quickly as they become available. Current changes include: Colombia and Indonesia.

Tapestry comment
The above list is not exhaustive and we will discuss the detail of these changes in our 12 January webinar. Many countries have made adjustments to tax bands and to social security caps. If you need specific advice for any jurisdiction, please let us know. 

Netherlands - change to taxable moment withdrawn

As discussed in our alert (here), last October the Dutch government released details of a proposed change to the timing of the taxation of options which are subject to selling restrictions. Under the proposal, employees would be able to choose to defer the taxable moment of their options from exercise to the moment the underlying shares can be traded by the employee. The amendment was due to come into force at the start of 2022, but the proposal was withdrawn by the Dutch government. The suggestion is that the proposal will be replaced by new rules that will apply to unlisted or start-up companies only. In any event, it is unlikely that there will be any new legislation in place before 2023.

Tapestry comment
It is disappointing that this practical proposal has not been taken up by the Dutch government. If we hear any more news on this, we will let you know.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss any element of legal and tax compliance for your global incentive plans, do get in touch - we would be delighted to help!

Emma, Sonia and Tom

Tapestry Alert: UK - The IA Principles of Remuneration 2022

Tapestry Newsletters

18 November 2021

The Investment Association (IA) has this morning released its updated Principles of Remuneration, with the usual accompanying letter to Remuneration Committee Chairs setting out member expectations for the 2022 AGM season.

Full copies can be found here: 2022 Principles and RemCo Chair letter.

As expected, the 2022 Principles include an update on shareholder expectations regarding the effects of COVID-19 and its aftermath. Critical calls remain for companies to consider the wider stakeholder experience when determining executive remuneration outcomes, to disclose their approach, to show restraint where they have taken and not repaid government support, and to not pay annual bonuses in such cases. An updated statement on investor preference is also included to confirm that, where share prices have fallen, the grant size of future long-term incentive awards should be reduced, rather than relying on discretion at vesting to adjust outcomes.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) metrics also remain high on the agenda, with investors now wanting a statement from those companies that have not already incorporated ESG metrics into their remuneration structures to explain how they will be incorporating these and the approach they will take in future years.
 
Other changes include a reminder on expectations regarding the alignment of executive pension contributions with the wider workforce (and the policy and report red-topping that will be imposed if this is not met for incumbent directors by the end of 2022) and a new section on the increasingly popular Value Creation Plans.

We will issue a further alert to take you through the changes to the Principles in more detail and the impact that we expect these changes to have. If you would like to see a comparison of the 2022 Principles against last year’s version in the meantime, then please get in touch.
 
Sally Blanchflower

Tapestry Alert: Canada - Ruling finding termination provisions unenforceable overturned

Tapestry Newsletters

20 October 2021

This week the Court of Appeal of Ontario have overturned the previous decision on enforceability of termination provisions which we reported on previously here

Background
In July last year, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc.) found that termination provisions providing that an employee lost their right to unvested awards upon termination without cause were "harsh and oppressive". The Court also held that the employer had not taken sufficient steps to highlight these provisions to the employee. 

On the basis of this decision, we were recommending that:

  • companies review their termination provisions from a Canadian perspective to see whether they would be viewed as "harsh and oppressive"; and
  • to review the acceptance process to ensure that sufficient steps had been taken to highlight these provisions to Canadian employees. 

Update
The employer appealed the decision. We understand that the Court of Appeal for Ontario focused on the finding that the employee had not received notice of the termination provisions. On 18 October 2021 the Court of Appeal overturned the original decision. The decision was based on a number of factors, including that the employee made a conscious decision to not read the documents, despite indicating that they had by clicking to consent. 

As a result, it is now considered more likely that tick box acceptance of general plan terms will be enforceable in Canda. 

Tapestry comment
This appeal has been underway for some time, so it is great to see a final outcome. Whilst the former employee now has 60 days to appeal, they may be unlikely to meet the high bar required for an appeal with the Supreme Court meaning this decision may continue to stand. 

This outcome means companies may go back to their previous approach of acceptance for Canadian participants (although you may want to wait the 60 days until we see whether the employee appeals the decision!). However, it is of course important to consider which provisions are worth drawing out to participants as a matter of best practice, and termination provisions may be considered by many as being a significant provision to draw out (particularly depending on the termination provisions in question). 


If you have any questions on this alert, please do let us know.

Lorna Parkin and Emilie Sylvester

Tapestry Alert: The Netherlands - Proposed change to when options are taxed

Tapestry Newsletters

13 October 2021

As part of its budget for 2022 (presented at the end of September), the Dutch government has proposed a change to the timing of the taxation of employee share options.

What are the current rules?

Under the current legislation, option plans are taxable on exercise, which can result in the employee having to sell shares to pay the tax. Although this is the standard moment of tax for option plans, issues can arise, especially for employees of private companies (e.g. start-ups), if the shares are not easily tradable, or if the shares cannot be sold, e.g. because the entirety of the shares being acquired are subject to a holding or lock-up period. This is mainly because it may not be possible to sell the shares in order to pay the tax, and the employee may not have sufficient cash available to pay the tax on exercise.

What are the proposed new changes?

Under the proposed new rules, if the shares are not tradable, employees will be able to choose whether to pay tax on exercise or to defer the taxable moment to the point when the underlying shares can be traded. If an employee defers the taxable moment, as long as transfer restrictions continue to apply, the shares will not be considered tradable and taxation will take place at the time the acquired shares become tradable. ‘Become tradable’ is defined as the moment on which any sale restrictions are lifted and the employee may sell the shares they acquired on exercise.

The value of the shares at the relevant taxable moment is used to calculate the tax that is payable. As a result, if the employee defers the tax point from exercise to when the shares are tradable, an increased amount of tax would likely be payable if the value of the shares increased during the deferral period. On the other hand, if the shares decrease in value over the deferral period, then a lower amount of tax would typically be payable. If the employee expects that the share price will increase after exercise, they may decide not to defer the tax point for this reason!

What are the impacts of the proposed changes?

The employee will retain the right to be taxed on exercise, even if the shares are subject to selling restrictions. However, the tax deferral automatically applies, so an election to opt out of the deferral must be made and recorded 'in a timely manner', and certainly before exercise. Note that, if the shares can be sold immediately on exercise, the shares will continue to be taxable upon exercise.

Restrictions apply to avoid long-term deferral of taxation. In particular, the deferral can be no longer than five years after the acquisition of the shares (for shares that are already listed) or five years after the IPO of a start-up or other private company.

When are the changes due to take effect?

The amendment is due to take effect on 1 January 2022. The new rules would apply to any options exercised on or after 1 January 2022 (regardless of when the options were awarded).

Tapestry comment
We are always delighted when rules are changed to make it easier for employees to benefit from share plans! This is an interesting change as, although it is common practice for options to be taxed on exercise, dry tax charges can be potentially problematic for employees of private companies where there may not be a market for the shares. We suspect that the change will be more useful to employees of unlisted companies for this reason, so this change is a welcome development for them. For employees of listed companies, the shares will likely immediately be tradable on exercise, unless for example they are all subject to a lock-up or other form of holding period. Companies may prefer employees to continue to pay tax on exercise as this may be easier for companies to administer for withholding tax purposes.

We don’t yet know the format of the election that employees will need to make to opt out of the automatic tax deferral, however we will keep an eye on developments and keep you updated. Companies should keep a look out for this, given the impacts it will have on the processes for and timing of the taxation of options. Once this change takes effect, there will be two different ways of taxing options that are subject to restrictions, so companies will need to identify and record whether an employee wishes to follow the tax deferral route or if tax is to be paid on exercise (as is standard), and apply withholding accordingly.

We would like to thank our partner firm in the Netherlands, Graham, Smith and Partners, for alerting us to this change.

If you have any questions on this alert, please do let us know.

Sharon Thwaites and Sonia Taylor

Tapestry Worldwide Wrap-up - Tap-in to our global knowledge!

8 October 2021

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies. 
 
To help keep you up-to-date with recent global developments, we are holding our fourth and final Worldwide Wrap-Up webinar for 2021 to highlight some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. We will be covering the below topics and more in more detail on our 13 October webinar.

Australia - employee share scheme tax and regulatory reforms
In July, the Australian government released draft legislation to implement reforms to the taxation and regulation of employee share schemes (ESS) announced in the 2021 budget. In brief, the draft legislation covers:

  • the removal of the taxing point on cessation of employment for employee share-based awards;
  • simplifying the securities law exemptions for both listed and unlisted companies including by creating a distinction between offers of free shares and contributory plans.

The draft legislation was subject to a period of consultation which ended on 25 August. There is currently no timetable for enactment of the new legislation but note that under the current draft, the removal of cessation of employment as a taxing point will only apply to awards granted on or after the start of the tax year following Royal Assent, so 1 July 2022 at the earliest.
Tapestry comment
Although this is only draft legislation, the proposals were widely welcomed by the business community in Australia and the general view is that the proposed changes will be enacted substantially as set out in the draft legislation. The overriding aim is to simplify the process of offering ESS plans and to make it more attractive to both employees and employers. We will be following the changes and will keep you updated.

 

China - Beijing SAFE additional reporting obligation
Any changes to the operation of the SAFE registered plan or any changes to the registered participation list must be filed as an 'alteration registration' with the local SAFE office within three months. In June, Beijing SAFE announced that it now requires companies to provide details of the accumulated grants of each relevant participant (i.e. a full breakdown of the number of shares granted to each participant) when this filing is made. 
Tapestry comment
This is potentially an onerous new burden as the information has to be compiled in time for the filing. This can create a timing issue for certain types of plans as the updated registration might not be able to be finalised until an enrolment window has closed. As always when dealing with a SAFE filing requirement, it is crucial to plan ahead and to be prepared for changes in the information required. 

 

China - new data protection law

China has recently introduced new data security legislation to supplement the existing Cybersecurity Law of China.

  • The Data Security Law (effective 1 September 2021) establishes a fundamental and categorised data security system, applying to potentially all data processing activities.
  • The Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, effective 1 November 2021) is more focussed on personal information protection and safeguarding the rights of personal information subjects. PIPL has some similarity to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The new data securities legislation imposes strict obligations on organisations in relation to the collection, processing, use and transfer of personal data.
Tapestry comment
This supports the general direction of travel globally that countries are seeking to implement stronger data protection laws and enforcement powers. It is important to be aware that generic consent clauses may not always be sufficient for local compliance. Companies may wish to undertake an audit of their internal privacy policies and consider what administrative and technical processes could be put in place to fill current compliance gaps and, on-going, to monitor compliance with PIPL. 

 

Netherlands - proposed change to taxable moment
The Dutch government has proposed a change to the timing of the taxation of options which are subject to selling restrictions. Under the proposal, employees can choose to defer the taxable moment of their options from exercise to the moment the underlying shares can be traded by the employee. If an employee chooses to defer the taxable moment, as long as transfer restrictions apply, the shares will not be considered tradable and taxation will take place at the time the acquired shares become tradable, i.e. when any sale restrictions are lifted and the employee may sell the shares they acquired on exercise. The employee retains the right to elect to be taxed on exercise.
 
The share option will have to be taxed no later than five years after the acquisition of the shares (for shares that are already listed) or five years after the IPO of a start-up.
 
The amendment is due to take effect on 1 January 2022.
Tapestry comment
We are always delighted when rules are changed to make it easier for employees to benefit from share plans! As always, the devil will be in the detail and we look forward to seeing how the proposal develops. 

 

Romania - additional securities disclosures abolished
Previously, for companies looking to rely on the employee share plan exemption under the EUPR, separate disclosure requirements were required under Romanian securities law (beyond the information specified in the EUPR). This requirement has now been abolished, so from 24 September 2021, the additional disclosures are no longer required and companies will only have to make the standard EUPR information disclosures.
Tapestry comment
This is a helpful and positive move by the Romanian securities authority. The background to the EUPR was to harmonise the securities requirements of all EU member states but unfortunately many countries have imposed their own filing or reporting obligations. This has resulted in additional costs and complications for employers making offers to employees in those countries. By abolishing the need for a separate disclosure regime, the Romanian securities are bringing the rules in line with the EUPR.

 

UK FlagUK - increase in national insurance and dividend tax rates
The government has announced increases to both National Insurance Contribution (NICs, the UK social security) rates and dividend tax rates, in an attempt to boost the NHS (National Health Service) and fund reforms to the social care system. 

From April 2022, NICs rates will rise by 1.25% for both employees and employers.  From 2023, the additional 1.25% will be ring-fenced as a new health and social care levy.

Currently, dividends in the UK are taxed at 7.5% for basic rate taxpayers, with increased rates for higher and additional rate taxpayers. From April 2022, each of these rates will rise by 1.25%. The current £2,000 tax-free allowance for dividends will not be affected.
 
These changes will impact almost all individuals working in the UK, including those employed by overseas companies.
Tapestry comment
Most working individuals will be affected by these increases in some way or another. From an incentives point of view, the UK’s tax-qualified share plans could prove to be more popular than ever because they all provide ways in which individuals and companies can pay less or no NICs. However, it isn’t clear yet if the health and social levy will also be excluded under UK tax-qualified plans and we will be looking closely at the detail of the new levy when they are released.

We hope you can join us for our webinar on 13 October as we go through the key regulatory and tax updates from the last quarter, including those set out above and more, and how these may impact your share plan offerings

If you have any questions or would like to discuss your global legal or tax compliance, please do get in touch - we would love to help! 

Lorna Parkin, Lewis Dulley and Rebecca Campsall

 

Tapestry Alert - UK - Taxes on the Rise!

Tapestry Newsletters

8 September 2021

Yesterday, the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, announced increases to both National Insurance rates and dividend tax rates, in an attempt to boost the NHS (our National Health Service) and fund reforms to the social care system. 

These changes will impact almost all individuals working in the UK, including those employed by overseas companies.

National Insurance

The rates of National Insurance contributions (NICs, which is our social security) in the UK vary depending on employment status earnings. Most UK employees contribute 12% on weekly earnings between £184.01 and £967, and 2% on anything above that. Employers also contribute, generally, at a flat rate of 13.8% for their employees’ weekly earnings above £170. 

From April 2022, NICs rates will rise by 1.25% for employees and employers. 

From 2023, the additional 1.25% will be ring-fenced as a new health and social care levy. This levy will be paid by employers and all working adults, including those over the state pension age (unlike other NICs) and those who are self-employed. 

Dividend tax 

Currently, dividends in the UK are taxed at 7.5% for basic rate taxpayers (with increased rates for higher and additional rate taxpayers). Individuals also currently have an initial £2,000 tax-free allowance for dividends.

Dividend tax rates will rise by 1.25% from April 2022. The tax-free allowance for dividends is unchanged, however. 

Tapestry comment  
Most working individuals will be affected by these manifesto-bursting increases in some way or another and pensioners will be alarmed by both the door being opened to NICs charges in retirement, as well as the (temporary) abandonment of the so-called pension “triple lock”. Despite the recent review into capital taxes, there is so far no change proposed to capital gains tax (one of the few taxes the Government haven’t committed not to increase). So, we may yet see more rises and change elsewhere.

With that in mind, from an incentives point of view, the UK’s tax-qualified share plans may prove to be more popular than ever.

Under a Share Incentive Plan (or SIP) for example, shares are free from income tax and NICs if kept for 5 years. Dividends can also be reinvested in the SIP free of income tax and NICs, provided the “dividend shares” are then held in the plan for 3 years. Save as you earn plans (or SAYE) also allow for income tax and NICs savings, on the increase in value of any shares.

Elsewhere, Enterprise Management Incentives (or EMIs) and Company Share Option Plans (or CSOPs) also allow individuals to benefit from income tax and NICs and relief in certain situations.

Whilst the UK’s tax-qualified plans offer different benefits, they all provide ways in which individuals can pay less or no income tax and NICs. With the proposed rises to NICs, these plans should be looking more appealing to employers and employees alike. In addition, global employers will need to review their UK award documents generally and consider, in the long run, if references to social security will need to be updated to also refer to the health and social care levy. 


If you have any questions regarding these changes, or your share and incentive plans generally, please do contact us and we would be happy to help.

Chris Fallon, Sarah Bruce & Tom Parker

Financial Services: EU - IFD Regulatory Technical Standards adopted

18 August 2021

The European Commission has adopted regulatory technical standards (RTS), supplementing the remuneration provisions of the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).

The RTS are as follows:

  1. RTS on the identification of material risk takers (MRT) - this RTS specifies the qualitative and quantitative criteria that firms subject to the IFD remuneration requirements will use to identify categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the firm or of the assets that it manages.
  2. RTS on instruments used for variable remuneration - this RTS specifies the classes of instruments that adequately reflect the credit quality of a firm that is subject to the IFD remuneration requirements as a going concern and also possible alternative arrangements that are appropriate to be used for the purposes of variable remuneration.

The adopted RTS will now be reviewed by the Council of the EU and EU Parliament and, provided neither body objects, the RTS will enter into force from the fifth day following their publication in the Official Journal of the EU.

Tapestry Comment
The IFD and its counterpart regulation, the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR), introduced a new prudential regime for investment firms. The IFD had to be implemented by EU Member States by 26 June 2021 and the IFR applied directly from that date. Once these RTS take effect they will supplement the remuneration requirements set out under the IFD and IFR. Firms that are subject to the IFD and IFR should review the adopted RTS carefully and consider the impact that these may have on the firm’s remuneration structures.
 
Given that the Brexit transition period has ended, these adopted RTS will not automatically apply in the UK. The UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) approach to MRT identification and the use of instruments for variable remuneration in investment firms is set out in the recently published FCA Investment Firm Prudential Regime Policy Statement.


If you have any questions on this or anything else, please do get in touch. We would be delighted to help. 

Matthew Hunter and Lewis Dulley

Financial Services: UK - MRT identification and reporting updates

Tapestry Newsletters

29 July 2021

Last week was a busy one for the financial services sector – with multiple updates from the PRA. We have summarised these for you below.  

1. PRA modifies MRT identification 

On 23 July 2021, the PRA published a direction for modification by consent to exclude from identification as material risk takers (MRTs) those employees who do not have a material impact on the firm’s risk profile but whose total remuneration exceeds the quantitative criteria set out in the Material Risk Takers Regulation (MRT Regulation).

In addition, the PRA published guidelines for the Direction and updated their webpage on waivers and modifications. 

Background
The Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook specifies that its rules apply in relation to (among others) employees identified as MRTs under Article 7 of the MRT Regulation. Article 7 contains a mechanism to exclude employees from being identified as MRTs who meet the pay-based criteria but are considered not to have a material impact on the firm's risk profile. This exclusion requires PRA advance approval in the form of a rule waiver or modification. 

What's changed? 

The PRA is offering a modification by consent for CRR firms to exclude employees from identification as MRTs pursuant to Article 7. Where granted, the modification has effect in respect of the relevant performance year. A new application is required for each performance year. 

Implementation

The application for this rule modification by consent should be supported by sufficient evidence that the employees meets the conditions set out in Article 7 (firms may use the appropriate Remuneration Policy Statement template. If the employee’s total remuneration is above EUR1 million, the firm should provide adequate information that describe the exceptionality of the circumstances.

If a firm wishes to use this facility, they should read the direction and contact their supervisory contacts and the PRA’s Authorisations division by email with a request for the modification. The PRA will then confirm in writing whether the request has been granted and will publish the approved modification direction on the Financial Services Register (this will not include personal details of the employees applicable).

2. PRA issue statement on definition of "higher paid material risk  taker"

On 21 July 2021, the PRA published a policy statement correcting an error in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the PRA Rulebook. 

Background
The PRA published its final rules on the implementation of the CRD V Directive on 29 December 2020. These rules contained the error. 

The PRA noted the error in February 2021 and later published a consultation paper looking at how to correct the position (CP9/21) in April 2021. This has led us to the statement made on 21 July. 

What's changed?
In CP9/21, the PRA proposed a change to the definition of a 'higher paid material risk taker' so either limb of that definition could be satisfied. This means a higher paid material risk taker is an individual who is either a person: 

(a) whose annual variable remuneration exceeds 33% of their total remuneration; or
(b) whose total remuneration exceeds £500,000. 

The original (erroneous) version of the definition required both (a) and (b) to be met for a person to be a higher paid material risk taker. 

The purpose of this amendment is to align the ‘higher paid material risk taker’ definition with the PRA’s intentions and ensure that proportionality cannot be applied to material risk takers who also have material monetary incentives to take potentially excessive risk, in turn promoting the alignment of MRTs’ remuneration and prudent risk-taking. 

Implementation
The instrument and the revised supervisory statement came into force on 23 July 2021. Firms are not required to apply the corrected definition to remuneration that has been paid, vested or is subject to an obligation to pay or vest which was created before 23 July 2021 and in respect of the first performance year beginning on or after 29 December 2020.

3. PRA update self-assessment templates and tables

As reported on here the PRA announced it was going to review the templates that may be used by firms to communicate to the PRA information on their MRTs' identification and exclusion (known as the Remuneration Policy Statement (RPS) tables 1a, 2 and 8). 

The PRA have now amended and published their revised MRT exclusion template and RPS templates.

The updated RPS tables allow firms whose performance year started on or after Tuesday 29 December 2020 to keep a record of all MRTs identified for the current performance year. The remaining templates will be published in November 2021.

Those templates applicable to firms whose performance years started before Tuesday 29 December 2020 remain available.

All templates can be found here under the "Self-assessment templates and tables" heading. 
 

Tapestry comment

It has been a busy week for the PRA! These updates have come in thick and fast but firms were likely prepared for some of these updates. Earlier consultations outlined the PRA’s proposed changes to MRT identification and the consequential templates so these will not come as a surprise for most.

If applicable, firms should ensure they are using the most up-to-date RPS templates to record their remuneration policies, practices and procedures. Firms with a fiscal year-end of 31 December may take advantage of the late submission of some of the tables / templates by 30 September, allowing more time to submit the RPS tables on MRT Identification and Exclusion (tables 1a, 2 and 8) the RPS Questionnaires and Annex 1: malus, but should note this extension is not expected to be available next year. 

The introduction of a “modification by consent” process by the PRA to exclude certain employees from identification as MRTs will hopefully make this process easier, but firms should ensure they contact their supervisory contacts and the PRA’s Authorisations division with a “suitable request”.


If you would like to discuss these changes, or anything else, please do contact us
 
Chris Fallon and Emilie Sylvester

FS: EBA publishes revised remuneration guidelines for CRD firms

Tapestry Newsletters

9 July 2021

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published their final report on the revised guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as recently amended. The publication follows a consultation process that ended on 29 January 2021. The consultation responses are summarised at the end of the final report document. The revised guidelines will take effect and replace the existing guidelines from 31 December 2021.  

Background

The EBA first published its guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the CRD in December 2015, in line with a mandate under the fourth iteration of the CRD, CRD IV. The guidelines apply to CRD firms and seek to harmonise the remuneration policies of CRD firms across Europe, in line with the CRD remuneration rules. The guidelines have now been updated to accommodate the changes to the CRD that were introduced by the latest iteration of the CRD, CRD V.

Key revisions

The key revisions to the guidelines impact the following topics:

  • Gender neutral – many of the changes relate to the requirement under CRD V that remuneration policies and practices are ‘gender neutral’, meaning that there must be equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value. These changes are wide-ranging. For example, the guidelines expect firms to be able to demonstrate that the remuneration policy is gender neutral and undertake specific additional record-keeping. The guidance also expects the supervisory function / remuneration committee review of the remuneration policy to include analysis of whether the policy is gender neutral and to monitor the development of the gender pay gap on a country-by-country basis separately for different categories of staff (in particular, see paras. 14, 23 – 27, 57(b), 63 – 65, 185(j), 198, 308 and 311(c)).
  • Remuneration policy – alongside other existing requirements, a firm’s remuneration policy for all staff should also be consistent with the firm’s ‘risk strategy’, including with regard to environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk-related objectives, and ‘risk culture’ (in particular, see para. 16).
  • Remuneration committee composition – the expectations as to the independence of the chair and majority of members of the remuneration committee have been amended, with the expectation for an independent chair and majority of members now only explicitly stated to apply to globally systemically important institutions and other systemically important institutions. For other significant firms, a sufficient number of members should be independent, as determined by competent authorities or national law (in particular, see para. 55).
  • Material risk taker identification – extensive updates have been made to reflect the CRD V changes to the process of identifying material risk takers and also the new regulatory technical standards  on identifying material risk takers. Amongst other things, the updates reflect the removal of the requirement to notify regulators of material risk taker exclusions where regulatory approval is not being sought (in particular, see paras. 98 – 122, 314 and 315).
  • Group consolidation – revisions have been made to the guidelines to clarify how CRD firms should apply the remuneration rules on a consolidated basis, including in relation to their non-CRD subsidiaries, such as investment firms and others financial institutions that are subject to a specific remuneration framework (such as UCITS and AIFMD firms) (in particular, see paras. 8 – 10, 75 – 84, 313 and 414).
  • Proportionality – in connection with the material amendments to the concept of proportionality that were made under CRD V, the EBA has provided procedural expectations for the application of the new proportionality thresholds and waivers, including the method of calculating the firm’s assets when applying firm-level proportionality and calculating individual remuneration when applying individual-level proportionality (in particular, see paras. 85 – 97).
  • Retention bonuses – the guidance on retention bonuses has been heavily revised and expanded. The revised guidance seeks to ensure that retention bonuses are only awarded where the firm can clearly demonstrate that the retention bonuses are justified and clarifies, amongst other points, that retention bonuses must comply with the relevant requirements on variable remuneration, including the ‘bonus cap’, with guidance specifying how the retention bonus should be included in the calculation of the ‘bonus cap’. The EBA noted in their consultation that these revisions are based on supervisory experience regarding cases of circumvention (in particular, see paras. 143 – 150).
  • Severance payments – the guidance on severance payments has been revised, including to clarify which payments can properly be regarded as severance payments and those which should not, and to also clarify when severance payments can be excluded from the scope of the deferral, payment in instruments and ‘bonus cap’ remuneration rules. As with retention bonuses, the EBA noted in their consultation that these revisions are based on supervisory experience regarding cases of circumvention (in particular, see paras. 151 and 162 – 176).
  • Disclosure – the guidance on the remuneration disclosure requirements that apply under the Capital Requirements Regulation has been removed as it has been superseded by the new implementing technical standards on disclosure, including remuneration disclosure (in particular, see the fact that there is no disclosure guidance anymore!).
  • Clawback – the EBA has removed the statement that clawback should, in particular, be applied “when the identified staff member contributed significantly to the subdued or negative financial performance [of the firm]”. The EBA has, however, added an expectation that where the application of malus is not possible in connection with an award due to the deferral requirement being disapplied using proportionality, firms should ensure that clawback can be applied (in particular, see paras. 294 and 296).

Timing

The revised guidelines will take effect and replace the existing guidelines from 31 December 2021.  

The guidelines are addressed to both competent authorities and firms directly.

Competent authorities will be required to notify the EBA as to whether or not they comply or intend to comply with the guidelines and incorporate them into their practices or, if not, the reasons for non-compliance. The date by which this notification needs to be made has not yet been stated. 

Tapestry comment
The guidelines have been amended extensively. The majority of the changes reflect the amendments to the remuneration rules under CRD V, with a notable focus on the new requirement for remuneration policies and practices to be ‘gender neutral’. The changes relating to, in particular, retention bonuses, severance payments and clawback do not derive from CRD V and instead reflect a change in the EBA’s focus and expectations in relation to existing requirements.

Many firms will already consider their remuneration policies and practices to be ‘gender neutral’ but, although the EBA has taken steps to clarify their new expectations following the consultation process, the guidance sets out a number of more granular expectations, such as those relating to record-keeping and supervisory function / remuneration committee oversight. These new expectations will need to be administered and policies and processes may need to be amended to implement the expectations. Firms should work through the practicalities of doing so.

 Except as noted under the ‘key revisions’ section of our alert above, or where minor changes have been made to reflect CRD V (e.g. changing references from 3 to 5 year deferral periods to the 4 or 5 years required under CRD V; referring to listed firms being able to offer share-linked instruments), much of the substance of the existing guidance remains unaffected, particularly with regard to structural elements of remuneration, such as in relation to the award, pay-out and risk adjustment processes. This is generally positive news but firms should take this opportunity to remind themselves of the EBA’s existing expectations, as well as ensuring that the firm is familiar with the new expectations on topics such as retention and severance payments. Impacted firms should take the time to review the revised guidelines in detail, understand exactly how the changes will impact existing practice and, where appropriate, make changes to comply.

For UK regulated firms, it is important to remember that the UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority are not required to incorporate the revised EBA guidance into their regulatory expectations. The UK regulators may decide to do this and, if so, should engage with firms on that basis ahead of any changes to their expectations. Staff members of UK firms may, however, become subject to the revised guidance where they fall within the scope of consolidation of an impacted firm, depending on the specific facts. This should be considered in detail.  

Please note that the revised guidelines will need to be considered alongside two other sets of revised EBA guidelines that the EBA has also published: (a) the revised joint ESMA and EBA guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders under CRD and the MiFID II Directive; and (b) the revised guidelines on internal governance under CRD.  Both sets of revised guidelines reflect the changes implemented by CRD V and the new Investment Firms Directive. The former specifies, amongst other points, that a gender-balanced composition of the management body is of particular importance. The latter sets out, amongst other points, expectations for remuneration committees and further expectations as to how firms should ensure that their policies, including remuneration, recruitment and succession policies and plans, are gender neutral. 

If you would like to discuss these changes, or anything else, please do contact us
 
Matthew Hunter
Matthew Hunter

Tapestry Worldwide Wrap-up - Tap-in to our global knowledge!

July 2021

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies.

To help keep you up-to-date with recent global developments, we are holding our third Worldwide Wrap-Up webinar for 2021 to highlight some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. We will be covering the below topics in more detail on our 14 July webinar

Australia - removal of tax on termination
Currently, when an individual leaves employment and retains any unvested shares under a tax-deferred Employee Share Scheme (ESS) in Australia, taxation will generally be triggered at that time. The 2021 Budget announced the removal of the tax trigger at cessation of employment (see our alert here). This change will now likely apply to ESS interests issued from the next Australian income year (1 July 2022). 
Tapestry comment
Whilst the removal of early taxation for leavers is beneficial for ESS, and brings the tax treatment in line with many other jurisdictions (making global compliance much easier), the rules only applying to issues following implementation of the change means the benefits may not be recognised for some time. 

Brexit - GDPR decision adopted
On 28 June, the EU Commission adopted an adequacy decision (see our alert here) confirming that the UK’s data protection rules are fit for EU purposes. This means the UK will not be treated as a third country for the purposes of the EU General Data Protection Regulation and allows the continued free flow of data between the EU and UK. 
Tapestry comment
The deadline for adoption of the EU adequacy decision was 30 June so we were literally checking this one every day! It was a relief to receive the adequacy decision in time and see that 'business as usual' applies (at least for the next 4 years). It also means that EU companies do not have to adopt (potentially!) cumbersome alternatives when transferring data to the UK. 

Canada FlagCanada - cap on deductions for stock options takes effect
The cap on the tax reduction available for option-holders finally took effect on 1 July, limiting the scope of tax benefits available to participants, but possibly allowing for a corporate tax deduction for employers (see more here).
Tapestry comment
This change has been in the pipeline for a while and most companies will have likely factored this into their planning and communications. The availability of the tax deduction has made options popular in Canada and the cap may result in a desired switch to other award types (although employees can still take advantage of the beneficial tax treatment up to the CAD200,000 cap). 

Germany - tax advantage increase
Germany has recently introduced the following tax advantages available to employee shareholders:
Discounted or free shares offered to employees of small or medium sized start-ups (less than 12 years old): income on compliant shares will not be taxed until the earlier of sale, termination of employment or 12 years from the date of transfer to the employee.
Tax break: the existing tax break for free or discounted shares (where shares are offered to all employees) has been increased from EUR360 to EUR1,440 per year.
Both of the above came into effect on 1 July 2021.
Tapestry comment
The low value of the tax break previously available in Germany, and the high administration costs, meant this tax advantage was rarely utilised. Increasing this threshold, and implementing a tax regime for start-up businesses, will hopefully see a growth in take-up, and it is great to see governments recognising and supporting the benefits of employee share ownership. 

Ireland - new share plan reporting
The Irish Revenue has released a new electronic return for reporting all share-based remuneration (specific share plan reporting already applies to option plans and approved share plans). The template for the Form ESA can be downloaded from the Revenue’s website and must be filed by 31 August 2021 (for tax year 2020). Moving forward the return deadline will be 31 March (see more here). 
Tapestry comment
We are not that far from 31 August! Companies should begin to prepare for this filing (including registering to make e-filings through the Revenue's online system), particularly if reporting in Ireland will be new, to ensure you have the information to hand before the deadline looms. The scope of the filing means employers with larger scale and/or more complex share incentive arrangements in Ireland must be (unfortunately!) prepared for a more time-consuming reporting process. 

UK FlagUK - tax new year?
For historic reasons, the UK's tax year for individuals begins on 6 April. This is different to most other jurisdictions (which have a 1 January tax year). In June, the (aptly named) Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) announced it was conducting a review as to whether to move the end of the UK tax year for individuals from the current 5 April to either 31 March or 31 December. To minimise disruption, the review will focus on the 31 March date (which is the government tax year end date and the date used for corporation tax rate changes). For more on what we thought was surely an April Fool's joke (!) please see here
Tapestry comment
A report from the OTS is expected this summer but note the OTS is only an advisory body and any changes to the tax year will ultimately be decided by the government. We will be watching with interest and you can be sure that we will let you know the outcome of the review. 

We hope you can join us for our webinar on 14 July as we go through the key regulatory and tax updates from the last quarter, including those set out above and more, and how these may impact your share plan offerings. 

If you have any questions or would like to discuss your global legal or tax compliance, please do get in touch - we would love to help! 

Hannah Needle, Sonia Taylor and Emilie Sylvester