COVID-19: Weekly Catch Up on Global Changes

During these unprecedented times, companies are facing a lot of commercial uncertainty. The impacts of COVID-19 are far-reaching and fast-moving and incentive plans do not escape the consequences. 

In some countries these changes have impacted:

  • Reporting: filing and reporting may continue to be required but practically is this still possible? What are countries doing to assist companies in meeting their compliance requirements? 
  • Salary deductions: Governments are assisting in funding wages, but does this impact payroll deductions or wage withholding?
  • Dividend payments: regulators are requesting dividend payments to be suspended, but do companies have the ability to do so?

With all of these changes taking place all over the world daily and at a high pace, the task of keeping up (both maintaining compliance and grasping opportunities) is enormous! 

... so how can we help? 

Now more than ever is the time for community and coming together, and we want to help as much as we can. 

We have been working with our global community of incentive lawyers to look at the impact on share plans around the globe. Each week we will be sending updates to our clients and subscribers with a weekly COVID-19 Catch Up of key global updates and impacts on incentives to keep you as up-to-date as possible. 

Weekly wrap-up: 

China - SAFE Filings: China are accepting quarterly filings which have been made late.
Tapestry comment
This is helpful during a time where companies are struggling to get documents reviewed and signed but filing on time is, of course, preferred if possible. 

EU - Financial Services: the regulators in both Germany and the UK have given strong guidance to banks that they should not pay dividends at this time. 
Tapestry comment
In a time where cash is king, this will be unsurprising news to most but unwelcome to some. Communicating this to participants in the context of their awards will be key. 

Luxembourg - Deferral of Tax Filing: the filing date for tax returns has been postponed to 30 June, 2020. 
Tapestry comment
This takes some pressure off companies whilst they try to meet their compliance requirements. Companies should think of preparing filings ahead of time to avoid delays in case there are still practical difficulties in June. 

Thailand - Securities laws: The Thai Securities Regulator is now accepting scanned copies of signed forms for filings where they normally ask for originals.
Tapestry comment
This is definitely welcome to avoid delays. As we are currently unsure whether regulators will later require originals, it is important that companies keep a copy of the original signed documents.

USA - Employee support: the CARES Act has provisions for payroll loans to employers to incentivise employers to keep employees employed. The loan has to be used for payroll, rent and utilities and the loan is provided tax-free if certain conditions are met. 
Tapestry comment
Whilst this does not directly impact incentive plans, this is a welcome benefit during these times of uncertainty. The terms of these loans should be reviewed to ensure they meet the conditions to be offered tax-free.

The Tapestry Team are always available if you would like to speak to us about any of your countries and operating your share plan globally during this time, so please do get in touch.

We are also running a series of webinars on key issues affecting global share plans and will be launching a 'Spring into Spring' series of webinars shortly to do a deep dive into some of the topics which we think may be helpful to you at this time.

Lorna Parkin and Sally Blanchflower

COVID-19: UK IA letter on expectations & support

8 April 2020

The Investment Association (IA) has sent a letter addressed to FTSE 350 companies expressing support from investment managers for British businesses in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and setting out what the IA expects to see in certain key areas, including executive remuneration.

Remuneration

  • The IA restates its goal of delivering long-term value and security for investors, and despite the current crisis, wants companies to ensure they are thinking long-term too. For remuneration, this means the IA favours companies that reflect cancelled dividend payments and/or changes to workforce pay in their approach to executive pay - as set out in the IA Principles of Remuneration which require pay to be linked to performance and shareholder experience.

Other points

  • Engagement and communication - shareholders will support a focus on the most business-critical issues, so companies can focus on building a long-term sustainable future.
  • AGMs - again, shareholders will focus on key material issues affecting businesses, as well as encouraging flexibility to ensure AGMs can go ahead while respecting ‘Stay at Home’ measures.
  • Dividends - the IA recognises that there is no one size fits all approach here, and the most important thing is that companies act transparently and in the interests of their own sustainability - although where dividend payments are cancelled they should be resumed as soon as possible.
  • Financial reporting - as we recently reported on in a newsletter which can be found here, the IA welcomes the additional time the UK Financial Conduct Authority has given to companies to prepare their results and reports.
  • Additional capital - shareholders will look to support companies seeking additional capital where possible.

Tapestry comment
Many companies have already been looking at their own remuneration arrangements for their executives ahead of the IA’s guidance this week and other institutional investors’ letters to companies in the last few days. The arrangements we are seeing being considered include salary reductions, bonus waivers, arrangements which look to defer salary or settle in shares to conserve cash and align with shareholders, and changes to their share plans.

We will be holding a webinar on these alternative arrangements and will send out invitations next week.

It is helpful that the IA are supporting the alternative AGM arrangements being proposed. Many companies have their Remuneration Polices up for renewal this year and as well as other complications of AGMs not happening when they were due to happen, this facilitates the AGM business being done in a timely way.


If you would like to discuss the implications of this letter, or of COVID-19 on your incentives more generally, please do let us know.

Janet Cooper OBE

Janet Cooper

COVID-19: UK: FCA extends the deadline for annual accounts

26 March 2020

The UK Financial Conduct Authority has today published a statement providing temporary relief for listed companies facing the challenges of corporate reporting during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. The FCA has also published a related Q&A webpage. Those companies who do defer may also need to consider the impact on the timing of their upcoming grants and vesting of share awards.

Key points:

  • The requirement for companies to publish audited financial statements within four months from their financial year-end has temporarily been extended to six months. Companies may continue to publish within four months, if they wish, but the FCA is urging all companies who feel it appropriate to take the additional time offered.
  • The COVID-19 crisis will lead to companies re-thinking their financial calendars to ensure that the information disclosed is accurate and carefully prepared, and the FCA encourages this. 
  • The temporary relief does not currently extend to half yearly financial reports (interims) which should be published within 3 months of the half year-end.
  • The temporary relief is only relevant to companies that are subject to DTR 4.1 and does not include companies with securities admitted only to markets that are not regulated under MiFID, such as AIM.
  • The EU Market Abuse Regulation remains in force and companies are still required to fulfil their obligations under the Regulation, including the timely disclosure of inside information and respecting the prohibition on insider dealing. The FCA acknowledges that companies will need to carefully assess what constitutes ‘inside information’ at this time - what is material to the business’s prospects may now have shifted.
  • On 21 March, the FCA requested that all listed companies delay the publication of their preliminary financial statements for at least two weeks, in order to absorb recent events and be able to take them into account when preparing their statements.  Whilst voluntary, the FCA has confirmed that the moratorium has been ‘well observed’ and that it will now end on 5 April 2020.
  • The extension of the publication deadline is intended to be temporary while the UK faces the extreme disruption of the COVID-19 crisis and its aftermath. The FCA will keep this under review and, when the disruption abates, will announce how it will end.

Tapestry comment
For many companies, the ability to delay the publication of the annual results will be a welcome relief at this difficult time. There are, however, a few key share plan related issues that companies should consider, and that will need to be managed and communicated to employees and administrators. These are: 

  • The delayed deadline for audited annual results and the ongoing moratorium for preliminary results may impact when grants can be made. Normally, share plan rules operated by UK listed companies will permit grants to be made within 42 days following the announcement of preliminary or audited results (as expected under the Investment Association’s Principles of Remuneration). Awards that are typically granted during this period would need to be delayed in line with the delay of the relevant preliminary or annual results, impacting the company’s normal grant (and, as a consequence in future years, vesting) cycles.
  • Under the EU Market Abuse Regulation, ‘closed periods’ of 30 days prior to the publication of preliminary or audited results, during which certain share plan related actions (such as the exercise of an award, or the sale of shares) by persons discharging managerial responsibilities cannot take place. These closed periods will move as a consequence of any delay of the preliminary or audited results, which may result in adverse consequences if they now fall within a ‘normal’ vesting cycle.
  • Companies should also check their own Share Dealing Code for the terms of any wider closed periods that might apply. These Codes often implement closed periods from the end of a financial period until the publication of the preliminary / annual results. Delaying these results could see considerably extended closed periods during times of ‘normal’ vesting cycles, which again may have adverse consequences as mentioned above.

If you would like to discuss the implications of this statement, or of COVID-19 on your incentives more generally, please do let us know.

Janet Cooper OBE, Hannah Needle FGE and Matthew Hunter

Janet Cooper
Hannah Needle
Matthew Hunter

COVID-19: UK Gender Pay Gap Report Filing suspended

25 March 2020

The Gender Pay Gap reporting in the UK has been suspended by the Government. The announcement was made on 24 March to suspend gender pay gap reporting requirements for this year due to the Coronavirus outbreak.

Key Points:

  • Gender pay gap reporting obligations, which look at the difference between the average earnings of men and women, expressed relative to men’s earnings, were introduced in 2017 and apply to businesses and organisations with over 250 employees. However, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government has decided that companies will not be expected to report their gender pay gap data this year.
  • Reporting for this year would have covered data from the 2018-19 “snapshot date”, which is 5 April every year. The deadline for reporting this data would have been 4 April 2020, and so any employers that have not reported already will have their reporting obligation suspended. Over 3000 employers have already completed their gender pay gap reporting  - about a quarter. The government has noted that any companies that are still in a position to report their gender pay gap data can continue to do so and will be provided with support by the Government Equalities Office.
  • Under normal circumstances, the Equality and Human Rights Commission would have the power to investigate any employers that fail to satisfy their gender pay gap reporting obligations, and these employers could face an unlimited fine after court action.

Tapestry Comment
Given the difficulties that many companies are facing in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, this decision by the government will be helpful to those companies that have not yet completed their gender pay gap reporting for this year or where they cannot now get into their office to do the filing.

Many companies will have already prepared their Gender Pay Gap Report though and will have been waiting until the end of the month to submit.  It is likely that many of those organisations, especially where they have good data and progress in their gender equality initiatives, will still want to submit or at least publish on their own website. It has been helpful that the Government Equality Office recognises that as offices have been forced to close some will not have access to their reports to be able to submit.  The UK’s Gender Pay Gap reporting requirements have been important in bringing gender equality to the forefront of boardroom discussions and, whether or not a company chooses to submit at a later date, if companies want to make progress on gender equality and show to women in their organisations that it is important, they may want to publish their data when they can.

It is worth noting that, at present, the government decision does not look to have any impact on future gender pay gap reporting obligations and deadlines, meaning that companies will still be expected to submit their gender pay gap reporting data for 2019-20 by April 2021.


If you would like to discuss the impact of COVID-19 on your share plans, please do let us know.

Janet Cooper OBE

Janet Cooper

COVID-19: Incentive plans in uncertain times

13 March 2020

Companies are facing imminent grant and vesting events under their incentive plans in times of substantial stock market turmoil, business disruption and general uncertainty. What are the questions you might be being asked by your internal stakeholders and investors, and what decisions might need to be made? 

  • How do we meaningfully value outstanding awards?
  • Can we delay grants and vestings (and should we)?
  • Are these the “exceptional circumstances” permitted to grant outside of our usual permitted window?
  • What grant price should we use to calculate the number of shares under award - is it fair or unfair to use the current share price?
  • How many shares will we need when granting new awards?
  • How will this impact our dilution limits?
  • Should we re-think our hedging strategy?
  • Are our performance conditions still appropriate, and can they be changed?
  • Should we exercise discretion when vesting awards - is now the time to override those formulaic outcomes?
  • What do we do about options that are now underwater?
  • What does our remuneration policy permit?
  • For our all-employee plans - do we have the answers if employees want to withdraw funds or stop contributing? Is now actually a good time to launch, re-launch or switch-up our offering?
  • Are there any clauses in our plan rules that help us step outside our usual practice?
  • How do we communicate the effects to our participants?

Tapestry comment 
The impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) is developing globally with alarming speed. More than ever, we are all having to adapt quickly to keep to “business as usual”. Companies are taking steps to protect their businesses and employees, and to mitigate the impact of the virus. These steps will involve accommodating pay and incentives in our shared new normal.

You may wish to reconsider standard or existing practice for your incentives in light of extreme stock market volatility and general business uncertainty. Delaying grants, revisiting whether existing incentives are fit for purpose and mitigating share and cash costs are some of the factors you will have to consider when examining your reward and incentive arrangements. Your individual company situation will, of course, be influenced by the markets and sectors you are in, and the calls from your particular investors.

If you would like to discuss any of the above to see what’s possible under your incentive plan rules and associated policies please get in touch, and look out for our upcoming webinar invite. 

On a wider note, we want to let you know that Tapestry has measures in place to ensure business continuity for our clients and the safety of our team. We are confident that we can continue to deliver high quality advice during these circumstances, as we are a flexible business that can adapt well to changes as they evolve. Tapestry will continue to remain available to partner with you in navigating these unique times.

We hope that you and your loved ones are, and stay, healthy and well.

Team Tapestry

UK Tax: The Chancellor Delivers UK Budget

On 11 March 2020, the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the UK Finance Minister) delivered his budget (financial statement) to the UK parliament.

There was little in the budget of direct relevance to share plans and the main topic today was, inevitably, the potential impact of the coronavirus on the economy and the introduction of measures to address this in the short term. 

Key measures:

Some of the announcements affecting employees and employers are set out below:

  • Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) schemes: A consultation has been launched to consider whether these tax-advantaged employee option schemes (currently only available to smaller businesses, and subject to certain criteria) should be made more widely available.
  • Entrepreneurs’ Relief: This relief (which confers a 10% rate of capital gains tax for disposals by shareholders holding more than 5% of a company) was retained, but the lifetime limit was reduced from £10 million to £1 million.
  • Social security: The earnings threshold for NICs (social security contributions) increased from £8,632 to £9,500.  These contributions are normally payable alongside income tax by employers and employees when share awards vest or are exercised.
  • Corporation tax: The rate of corporation tax remains unchanged at 19% (and will not drop to 17% as had been previously stated).

Tapestry comment
It will be interesting to see whether any significant changes are proposed to the EMI scheme following this consultation.  Depending on any restrictions imposed by the UK’s state aid rules after Brexit, it might be that this scheme, and its generous tax benefits, could be made available to larger businesses. 


Entrepreneurs’ Relief has not been abolished as some commentators had predicted, however the reduction in the lifetime allowance makes it less attractive, particularly when considered alongside the changes introduced in 2018 which made it more difficult for shareholders to qualify for the relief.

If you have any questions on how these changes may impact your share plans, please do contact us and we would be happy to help. 

UK: IA New report: priorities for 2020 & beyond

The Investment Association (IA) has released a report setting out its vision for driving long-term value in UK listed companies.

Background

The IA is a trade body representing the UK investment market, with 250 members collectively managing over £7.7 trillion worth of investments. It sets corporate governance best practice for UK listed companies and, through its corporate governance research service (IVIS), it assesses FTSE companies against the IA’s guidelines, the UK Corporate Governance Code and corporate governance best practice generally and flags any areas of concern for shareholders, to help inform AGM voting decisions.

The IA’s new report on Shareholder Priorities for 2020 supplements its other corporate governance work and outlines four key areas that the IA’s members have identified as key drivers for future-proofing, diversifying and increasing the long-term resilience and value of the UK’s listed market:

  • Climate change
  • Audit quality
  • Stakeholder engagement and employee voice
  • Diversity

The report outlines investor expectations in each area, the actions the IA intends to take to improve these areas and the approach IVIS will be taking in monitoring them.

Report highlights

1. Responding to climate change
Climate change poses a significant risk to businesses, society, the environment and, in the long-term, financial markets. Increasing regulation in this area, pressure to reduce emissions and extreme weather can affect supply chains and consumer demand.

Going forward, investors will expect:

  • Proactive identification and management of climate-related risk; and
  • Climate change-related disclosures in the company’s annual report – working towards full compliance with the Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations by 2022.

To support this, IVIS will introduce a new section to its ESG report highlighting whether the company has made climate-related disclosures in its annual report in relation to governance, risk management, strategy and metrics / targets – aligned with the TCFD recommendations.

2. Audit quality
Audit reform is a hot topic at the moment. The IA wants to encourage greater trust in a company’s audited information by increasing audit quality. It aims to do this by encouraging Audit Committees to challenge management and external auditors on their judgement and depth of analysis. The IA’s members are keen to hold further discussions with Audit Committees to understand barriers to improving audit quality and are willing to target votes on individual members of the committee and a company’s report and accounts where they are found lacking in this area.

To support this, IVIS will have a focussed section highlighting company disclosures on how the Audit Committee has held management and its auditors to account.

3. Stakeholder engagement and employee voice
Employees, customers, suppliers and local communities are key to a company’s success and long-term value. Stakeholder engagement and the employee voice is receiving increased focus following new reporting regulations on how directors have taken stakeholder interests into account and how companies have engaged with the wider workforce. The IA wants to take this one step further and see companies clearly identifying their wider stakeholders and reporting on how they have engaged with them and what impact that has had on board decision-making.

To support this, IVIS will report on whether the company has identified its stakeholders and disclosed how it has engaged with them.

4. Diversity          
Diversity is another hot topic at the moment, particularly in relation to corporate governance (see our recent alert on new ethnicity reporting requirements). There is a growing body of research indicating that diverse companies are more productive and sustainable. The IA acknowledges that there has been significant improvement in gender diversity at Board level but believes there is still more to be done, particularly in terms of ethnic diversity and (in terms of gender and ethnicity) greater diversity below Board level.

To support this, IVIS will now report on ethnic diversity at Board level. It will also red top any FTSE 350 company with:

  • Women representing 20% or less of the Board;
  • Only 1 woman on the Board (unless there are only 3 directors in total); or
  • Women representing 20% or less of the executive committees and their direct reports.

IVIS will amber top any FTSE SmallCap company on the same basis as above (except at a 25% level rather than 20%).

Timing

IVIS will start monitoring and reporting on these points this year, for companies with year ends on or after 31 December 2019. Colour-tops will not start in relation to climate change reporting until at least 2021.

Tapestry comment
The IA is an influential body in setting corporate governance principles and best practice guidance for UK listed companies. Its members, together, hold one third of the value of UK publicly listed companies, which gives the IA a powerful voice with which to influence company behaviour and hold businesses to account. UK listed companies in particular will be very interested in the outcome of this report, although IA recommendations often become best practice in the UK industry more widely, so it will be of interest to many companies.
 
It is no surprise to see that the IA views combatting climate change, increasing diversity, improving stakeholder engagement and high quality audits as critical to the long-term success of a company in 2020 and beyond. These are hot topics that many companies will already be engaging with, but the IA is now pushing them up the investor agenda in order to drive real change, in areas that investors see as critical to a company’s long-term success in the modern world.
 
As with all new corporate governance changes, there will be a journey towards compliance. Companies should consider the impact of the new IA focus coming out of the report, particularly in relation to new disclosure requirements. For many companies, these areas will be covered in this year’s IVIS reports, and companies currently preparing their annual reports should consider any changes they may want to make to take account of this. Companies should also consider the new approach to colour-topping gender diversity, particularly at below-Board level, the company’s approach to diversity generally, and whether any further improvements can be made. For example, research we conducted last year showed that 32% of the FTSE 100 now include diversity / gender targets in their incentive plans (a 17% increase on the previous year).
 
Companies who fail to make the improvements and disclosures identified in the report can expect to see increased shareholder dissent in the future – which, if significant, will be recorded and publicised on the IA’s Public Register of shareholder dissent.


Please do get in touch if you would like to discuss the possible impact of the IA’s report for you, or if you would like any help preparing your annual directors’ remuneration report – we would be happy to help.

Jan 2020: Wrap-Up: Global Knowledge OnTap!

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies. 

To help you keep on top of recent developments, here is our first quarterly Worldwide Wrap-Up of 2020, with some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. We have summarised these topics briefly in this alert, however they will be covered in more detail along with other recent developments on our 15 January webinar.

Argentina - currency controls
In our September Wrap-Up we alerted you to the re-introduction of currency controls in Argentina. The controls were tightened in October and, as outlined in our recent alert, have been extended indefinitely: monthly foreign exchange transactions by individuals remain capped at USD200, and the local entity sending monies offshore (including under a recharge agreement) is prohibited without Central Bank approval, which is unlikely to be granted.

Tapestry comment
Given the current economic position in Argentina it is unlikely that the rules will be removed, or substantially relaxed, any time soon. As a result, if you have not done so already, we recommend that any company with a share plan involving money leaving Argentina communicates the impact of these currency controls to participants, and considers what steps should be taken to re-structure the operation of their plan, if necessary.

Canada - cap on tax deduction
The implementation of the proposed cap on the stock option deduction (due to take effect from 1 January 2020 - see our September Wrap-Up), was initially delayed by the Canadian Federal election in October and has been further delayed by the Canadian finance minster, who recently announced that submissions received during the consultation period are still under review, further postponing the introduction of the cap.

Tapestry comment
Companies offering share options to employees in Canada will need to keep an eye on how this develops. The Canadian government has stated that the change will be implemented this year but it is unclear what changes will be introduced as a result of the current review process and what the actual implementation date will be.

China - beware the 6 month rule for leavers
As more companies choose to apply for SAFE approval to offer shares to employees in China, it is important to be aware of the details of the SAFE rules. One key condition is that when a participant ceases to be employed by an entity registered with SAFE, any outstanding awards need to be vested or lapsed (in accordance with the relevant plan rules) within 6 months and any vested shares must be sold and the proceeds returned to China. This rule applies even if the participant continues to be employed by another group company. An ongoing labour tribunal case, which has held that the employer is responsible for any loss suffered by employees where the employer cannot prove that the relevant condition was communicated to them, has highlighted the risk for employers who fail to warn employees of the potential impact of this rule.

Tapestry comment
We recommend that employees are informed of the 6 month rule, either by including it in a side letter, somewhere in the plan communications, or in a schedule to the plan rules.

Global tax rates for 2020 
For many countries, revised tax rates started on New Year’s Day. Often the rates are only announced in the last days of December, and in some cases the final figures are not available until well into January, or later. Our international advisors provide us with new rates to update OnTap as quickly as they become available, but here are some of the changes we are aware of so far:
Greece - reduction in top rate
Ireland - increased rates for employer social security
Lithuania - increase in top rate of tax
Malaysia - increase in top rate of tax
Turkey - new higher tax rate bracket added.

Tapestry comment
We will discuss the detail of these changes and others on our 15 January webinar. Many countries have made adjustments to tax bands and to social security caps. If you need specific advice for any jurisdiction, please let us know.

Greece - new tax favourable treatment for employee share options
Greece has introduced a new tax break for employees receiving shares under an employee share option plan. From 1 January 2020, any gains made following the exercise of options wil be subject to capital gains tax rather than income tax, if certain conditions are met e.g. specified holding periods. If applicable, tax will arise on the sale of the shares and be taxed at a flat tax rate. Different rules apply for unlisted shares of new companies, which will be subject to a longer holding period and a lower tax rate. It is not yet clear if the beneficial tax will apply to options granted prior to 2020, or if it will apply to other types of share plans.

Tapestry comment
This is a significant tax break for Greek employees as currently, share plan income is subject to income tax at up to 44%. Additional guidelines are expected in the coming months. We have seen several European countries granting this type of tax benefit for employee share plans. A similar benefit will apply to options granted to employees in Lithuania from 1 February 2020.

Indonesia - agreements must be in local language
A new regulation has been passed in Indonesia meaning that all agreements involving an Indonesian party must be written in Indonesian, and agreements involving a foreign party must also be written in the national language of the foreign party, or in English. The regulations provide for the contracting parties to decide which version should be given priority in case of a conflict.

Tapestry comment
The regulations do not include any penalties for non-compliance but they have to be read alongside a controversial  Supreme Court ruling in 2015, which deemed that any documents not translated into the Indonesian language would be null and void. As a result of that ruling, there was already a strong incentive to use translations where possible. 

UK - off-payroll working in the private sector
The UK government plans to extend legislation (known as IR35) which focuses on individuals who provide services through an intermediary (typically a personal service company) to an end-user client. Under IR35, the  intermediary is required to determine whether or not the worker would have been deemed to be an employee of the end-user client if the services were not provided through the intermediary. If so, the intermediary has to withhold income tax and employee social security (NICs) for the individual and also pay employer NICs.
In 2017, the obligation of determining whether the individual should be deemed to be an employee of the end-user client was passed to the client in the case of public sector employers. From  April this year, this obligation is due to extend to medium and large company end-user clients in the private sector as well. Public sector companies will also have extra responsibilities under the updated rules. The government announced this week that it is going to review the rollout of the extended IR35, with the review due to be completed by mid-February.

Tapestry comment
Assuming the roll out of IR35 takes place as planned, this  is an important topic that all employers should be mindful of. The majority of companies will need to be aware of their responsibility to determine the employment status of a worker for tax purposes and how to actually do this. Companies should ensure that tax teams have this on their radar and take the appropriate measures to prepare for these changes, ensure workers are informed about determinations and establish a process for dealing with any worker disputes. Where the contract or work practices change in any way, it is important for companies to review the IR35 rules to check whether they should apply. We will be keep you informed of any changes following the government’s review.

USA - national securities exchange in Silicon Valley
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently approved the creation of a new national securities exchange located in Silicon Valley: the Long-Term Stock Exchange. The LTSE has an increased focus on long-term goals and innovation. In line with this, its rules place limits on executive bonuses where they are in relation to short-term accomplishments, as well as rewarding long-term shareholders with increased voting powers in correlation with the time they hold the stock.

Tapestry comment
Because of its intended focus on longer-term planning over short-term results, the LTSE may provide a unique opportunity for later-stage, private start-ups with dual-class structures to list their shares. However, potential new public companies may find the requirements more burdensome than those of the NYSE and Nasdaq, e.g. the outstanding share and market capitalisation requirements are higher than on the well-established exchanges. With thanks to our US counsel, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, for their assistance with this entry.

USA - Reminder for Annual ISO and ESPP Reporting
The annual deadlines are fast approaching for delivering participant information statements and filing IRS information returns to report exercises of incentive stock options (ISOs) during 2019 and transfers during 2019 of certain shares of stock obtained by participants under employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs). Compliance with the participant information statement requirement is made by providing Form 3921 (or substitute) to participants who exercised ISOs and Form 3922 (or substitute) to participants who transferred certain shares of stock obtained under an ESPP.  Forms 3921 and 3922 (or substitutes) must be provided to relevant participants by 31 January 2020. Forms 3921 and 3922 are also used for IRS information returns, which must be filed with the IRS by 28 February 2020 for paper filings, or 2 April 2020 for electronic filings.

Tapestry comment
Tax reporting is an essential part of compliance and the US is a very high risk and, for most of our clients, an important jurisdiction.  Please let us know if we can help you with these filings.

Sept 2019 Wrap-Up: Tap-in to our global knowledge!

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory and tax compliance is a never-ending task for companies. 

To help you keep on top of recent developments, here is our quarterly Worldwide Wrap-Up, with some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar.

Argentina - currency controls

Argentina re-instated currency controls on 1 September. The new controls are not as complex as the system in place until late 2015, but there is now a ban on companies purchasing foreign exchange or transferring money abroad without the prior approval of the Central Bank. Individuals are able to purchase foreign exchange without restrictions up to a monthly cap of USD10,000. Any amounts over the cap require permission from the Central Bank. The new controls were initially intended to remain in place until the end of the year but there is growing expectation that the controls will be extended into 2020.
Tapestry comment
We all remember the complications caused by the previous currency controls in Argentina and can only hope that the current rules are lifted at the end of the year. In the meantime, employers will need to consider how these restrictions will impact on transfers under a recharge arrangement and transfers of salary deductions. Even without the monthly cap, employees’ savings in peso will buy fewer units of foreign currency and companies operating contributory plans in Argentina may want to look at how best to communicate with affected employees to explain the consequences on their share plan participation.

Canada - cap on tax deduction

As reported in our July Wrap-Up, the Canadian government has proposed that a 50% tax deduction, which currently applies to income received under an employee stock option plan, will be subject to an annual cap. Under draft legislation released in the summer, the cap will apply to shares granted from 1 January 2020. The proposed change will cap the tax relief for employees of ‘large, long established, mature firms’ at an annual amount of CAD200,000, based on the value of the shares at the grant date. Any amount over the cap will be subject to tax at the full progressive tax rates. Canadian employers will be able to claim a deductible benefit for the amount above the cap. The draft legislation remains subject to review and is not expected to be passed into law until after the federal election in October.
Tapestry comment
We will update you if anything new emerges out of the review or if the legislation is passed in advance of the election. Companies offering share options to employees in Canada may want to look at making grants in advance of the 1 January 2020 start date before the potential cap is introduced.

China - Shanghai to allow foreign workers to receive local share options

The Shanghai municipal government has released guidelines to allow foreigners employed by regional headquarters of multinational companies to receive stock options over shares listed in China. The municipal government is working with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), who are expected to publish details on the conversion of foreign currency into local currency to buy options and to repatriate any capital gains from the options. The aim of the policy is to encourage multinational companies to establish their local headquarters in Shanghai and it is expected to benefit around 1 million foreigners working on mainland China. It is unknown when this process may become available.
Tapestry comment
It is currently difficult to include non-Chinese nationals in a Chinese company's  share plan. This new policy would allow some companies to offer share options to ex-patriates based in China as part of their incentive package. The detail will reveal how much flexibility there is, but it is an interesting development and one that we will be watching.

Greece - capital controls end

Capital controls in place since June 2015 have finally been completely lifted by the Greek government. Although the controls have historically been relaxed several times, individuals and companies continued to be subject to limits on the amount of money they could send abroad. From 1 September, all controls have been removed.
Tapestry comment
This is great news! A significant and positive step for Greece as its economy recovers from the financial crash. For companies operating employee share plans in Greece, the lifting of the remaining currency controls removes any continuing barriers to employees participating fully in global share plans. An interesting contrast to Argentina!

Lithuania - tax break for share options

Lithuania is introducing a new tax break for employees receiving shares under an employee share plan. From 1 February 2020, the value of share options granted to employees will not be subject to personal income tax or social security if (i) there is a minimum 3 year vesting period and (ii) the shares are issued for free, or where the exercise price is below fair market value. Tax will not be payable until the shares are sold. The new rules will apply to stock options granted from 1 February 2020.
Tapestry comment
This is a significant tax break for Lithuanian employees as currently, share plan income is subject to income tax at up to 27%. The social security point is not new as under current rules, income under an option plan is already exempt from social security if the options cannot be exercised for a period of at least 3 years after grant. Additional guidelines are expected in the coming months. This is a reminder that Eastern European countries often have tax-qualified plans or tax exemptions which are worth considering.

USA - California - what is an employee?

California has signed into law controversial legislation (known as Assembly Bill 5 or AB 5), which aims to change the definition of an ‘employee’. AB 5 puts into law a Californian Supreme Court decision which established a revised test as to when someone is an employee or a contractor. The distinction is important as employee status can entitle workers to additional employer-funded benefits. The new rules will particularly impact on the self-employed status of workers in high-profile gig economy companies such as the ride-hailing groups Uber and Lyft and the food delivery service Door-Dash. Gig economy companies have said that they will oppose the new legislation and fund a campaign to have it overturned. For the time being, the new rules do not automatically change the status of workers, but may make it harder for companies to classify workers as contractors rather than employees.
Tapestry comment
The growth in the gig economy, with increasing numbers of people working as self-employed or contract workers, has created a model where flexibility for some is seen as insecurity and loss of benefits for others. The new Californian legislation will be of general application to people working in industries which rely on the use of contract workers. From a share plan perspective, non-employees are generally specifically excluded from the benefits of share ownership - share plans will usually be limited to employees and both tax and regulatory rules which provide tax breaks or securities exemptions for employee share plans may not extend to non-employees, including contractors. Whether gig economy workers do become employees is clearly a complex issue (and potentially costly for employers) and one which may affect the future target population of a company's share plans.

July 2019 Wrap-up: Tap-in to our global knowledge!

Staying ahead of the curve on regulatory compliance is a never-ending task for companies. With global legal and tax requirements ever-changing, it is increasingly difficult to avoid a misstep in every jurisdiction.

To help you keep on top of recent developments, here is our quarterly Worldwide Wrap-Up, with some of the most recent changes that should be on your radar. 

Australia
The Australian Government is currently considering reforms to the securities laws exemptions for unlisted companies. The proposed reforms include increasing the award cap from AUD5,000 to AUD10,000 per employee and allowing employees to participate in share purchase plans.
Tapestry comment
At present unlisted companies face several challenges when trying to operate share plans in Australia. With fewer restrictions, these reforms would noticeably improve the environment for unlisted companies. The outcome of this consultation is expected towards the end of 2019.

Canada
The Canadian Government is considering limiting existing tax relief for employees of ‘large, long established, mature firms’ who exercise options under an employee share plan. The proposal is a cap on the deduction available to CAD200,000 based on the value of the shares at the grant date. Further details will be released in summer 2019 and the actual change in the law may not come into effect for some time after that. Guidance is expected on exactly what type of companies will be in scope (as the aim is to not change the relief for employees of start-ups/fast growing companies).
Tapestry comment
This proposal may make options less attractive in Canada - especially to those employees with substantial awards that exceed the cap. Canada is one of many countries that wants to ensure it is an attractive place for people to start and grow a business without it being just high earners who reap the benefits of measures aimed at incentivising all employees. We will keep you up to date on how this develops.

Hong Kong
Salary deductions for the purpose of acquiring shares in an employee share plan are technically not permitted in Hong Kong. However, recent practice would indicate a change in practice as the Hong Kong Labour Department has recently allowed one of Tapestry’s clients to use salary deductions in the context of their plan.
Tapestry comment
Whilst this may signal a welcome change in practice, the law still prohibits salary deductions. Therefore, if you want to make salary deductions, you may want to consider approaching the Hong Kong Labour Department directly on this issue, although we recommend local advice is sought before doing so.

Luxembourg
From 21 March 2019, non-resident tax payers in Luxembourg can request to be treated the same as resident tax payers, subject to conditions.
Tapestry comment
The ability to be treated as a resident tax payer may prove to be beneficial to companies dealing with mobile participants, however this administrative benefit comes with the obligation to report on all worldwide income.

Saudi Arabia
From 1 April 2019, changes to Saudi securities laws took effect. These changes simplified the securities regime so that companies can offer shares to employees without having to follow the ‘authorised person’ requirements. Companies will be subject to a quarterly reporting obligation, but overall this change will mean companies find it easier to offer awards here.
Tapestry comment
Since this new regime came into effect, Tapestry have seen a number of clients take advantage of it. In some cases, companies which have historically only used cash in Saudi Arabia are now switching to using shares in their awards.

Singapore
From 1 April 2019, there is no longer any need to get approval from the Ministry of Manpower to make salary deductions in Singapore. Salary deductions will now be permitted provided that: (a) the employee willingly consents in writing; and (b) the employee must be able to withdraw consent at any time, without any penalty.
Tapestry comment
This is a really helpful change in Singapore which will allow for increased company flexibility and possibly an increase in the use of purchase plans there. Companies will no longer have to go down the route of obtaining Ministry of Manpower consent which was a complex and time consuming process.

UK
The UK’s departure from the EU is currently anticipated to be 31 October 2019 (“Brexit Day”). The UK is enacting legislation which will convert the prevailing EU law at the moment of Brexit into UK law so that, broadly, the same rules and laws will apply on the day after Brexit Day as on the day before.
A withdrawal agreement which governs how the UK will leave the EU and the basis for the longer term UK/EU relationship has also been reached. This agreement provides for a transition period which will apply from Brexit Day until 31 December 2020. During the transition, the UK will effectively be treated as a member of the EU for most EU laws. However, the UK has yet to formally ratify the withdrawal agreement meaning the UK could leave the EU without any agreed terms if the withdrawal agreement is not approved by the UK Parliament by Brexit Day. There is currently no consensus in the UK Parliament on the Brexit process. This has led to the resignation of Prime Minister Theresa May and means the UK will soon have a new Prime Minister who may attempt to renegotiate the terms of the withdrawal agreement. If it or another withdrawal agreement is agreed before 31 October, Britain will leave the EU on the first day of the following month. Otherwise the UK will leave the EU on 31 October even if a withdrawal agreement has not been agreed (a “no-deal” Brexit). 
Tapestry comment

Considering the current political climate in the UK - how, or even if, the UK will leave the EU is still very much unknown! If you have any concerns on how Brexit could impact your compliance obligations, please do get in touch.